1. AUTOMATIC STAY
1.1 Covered Activities
1.2 Effect of Stay
1.3 Remedies

2. AVOIDING POWERS

Location:

Section 546(e) of the Bankruptcy Code limits the ability of a trustee or debtor-in-possession to avoid as a constructive fraudulent transfer or preferential transfer a transaction in which the challenged settlement payment was made through a stockbroker or a financial institution.1 Because of the broad protection granted by section 546(e) – the so-called “safe harbor” provision – parties structuring a leveraged buyout (“LBO”) or similar transaction often ensure that settlement funds flow through one of the listed institutions to inoculate the beneficiaries from a later challenge as a constr

Location:

The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York recently held in Edward S. Weisfelner, as Litigation Trustee of the LB Creditor Trust v. Fund 1., et al.

Location:

In December, the Sixth Circuit, in Grant, Konvalinka & Harrison, P.C. v. Still (In re McKenzie), 737 F.3d 1034 (6th Cir. 2013), addressed two matters of first impression when it adopted the majority rules that (i) a creditor who seeks relief from the bankruptcy automatic stay has the burden to prove the validity of its perfected security interest in collateral; and (ii) the expiration of the two-year statute of limitations on bankruptcy avoidance actions does not prevent the trustee from asserting them defensively under section 502(d) of the Bankruptcy Code.

Location:

When a chapter 7 bankruptcy case is filed, a trustee is appointed to gather and sell the debtor’s assets.  To aid in this effort, the trustee is empowered to avoid certain transfers pursuant to Bankruptcy Code sections 544 - 550.  The trustee also is empowered, pursuant to Bankruptcy Code § 542, to seek turnover of assets belonging to the estate.  The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals recently held that a party may be required to turnover estate property even if the party is no longer in possession of such property.  See Shapiro v.

Location: