“Each player must accept the cards life deals him or her: but once they are in hand, he or she alone must decide how to play the cards in order to win the game.” – Voltaire
In re Triple A & R Inv., Inc., 519 B.R. 581 (Bankr. D. P.R. 2014) –
A mortgagee moved for relief from the automatic stay based on the debtor’s prepetition consent to stay relief. The debtor argued that a prepetition waiver was unenforceable.
A recent decision by the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Missouri held that a manufactured home is real property for purposes of Section 1322(b)(2) of the Bankruptcy Code. This holding prevents chapter 13 debtors from modifying a secured lender’s claim where the claim is secured by a lien on a manufactured home in Missouri that is the debtor’s primary residence.
Baker Botts L.L.P. et al. v. ASARCO L.L.C., currently pending before the Supreme Court of the United States, is of particular interest to bankruptcy practitioners because this decision will have far-reaching effects regarding attorney’s fees in bankruptcy. Specifically, the Supreme Court will determine whether Section 330(a) of the Bankruptcy Code grants bankruptcy judges the discretion to award compensation for the defense of fee applications.
Latham & Watkins operates worldwide as a limited liability partnership organized under the laws of the State of Delaware (USA) with affiliated limited liability partnerships conducting the practice in the United
Kingdom, France, Italy and Singapore and as affiliated partnerships conducting the practice in Hong Kong and Japan. The Law Office of Salman M. Al-Sudairi is Latham & Watkins associated office in the
In a recent decision by the Second Circuit, Lucas v. Dynegy Inc. (In re Dynegy, Inc.), No. 13-2581 (2d. Cir. Oct.
In re Killmer, 513 B.R. 41 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2014) –
After reopening a bankruptcy case, a mortgagee moved for a determination that a post-petition delinquent property tax sale was void because it was held in violation of the automatic stay. In response, the tax authority requested retroactive annulment of the stay.
The bankruptcy of fractional-share operator Avantair triggered a dispute regarding exactly what property its fractional-share owners held. Like other fractional-share operators, Avantair operated a fleet of airplanes, selling fractional shares in each of them to individual participants. Using Fractional Share Contracts consisting of interlocking purchase agreements, dry lease agreements, and fractional use agreements, Avantair controlled, operated, and maintained a fleet of aircraft owned by its participants.
Under section 365(f)(1), a debtor is permitted to assume and assign leases and executory contracts notwithstanding contractual limitations or “applicable law” that restricts such assignment. However, that broad general authorization begins with the limiting language, “except as provided in subsection (b) and (c) of this section….”