This alert describes issues to consider when a derivatives dealer counterparty becomes insolvent.We address below issues involving termination of a master agreement, close-out netting of underlying trades and collateral. Even though this alert focuses on the bankruptcy of a dealer, many of the issues would also arise in connection with the bankruptcy of most non-dealer counterparties.

1. Existence of an Event of Default and Termination

a. Existence of an Event of Default

Location:
  • Prior to the COVID-19 outbreak, we were seeing an increase in business restructurings and distressed transactions (whether going-concern sales or liquidations). Certain industries (e.g., retail and pharmaceuticals) were harder hit.
  • However, the pandemic and the resultant market turmoil will not be confined to any one industry (although some — airlines, hotels, cruises, sporting and entertainment, shipping, manufacturing reliant on foreign parts and, of course, retail — may be hit harder). Energy, oil and gas are suffering additional disruptions.
  • Location:

    The Bottom Line

    In CMH Liquidating Trust v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Case No. 16-cv-14434 (E.D. Mich. 2019) (CMH”), the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan held that an insurance policy that was renewed post-petition was still an executory contract, and thus, a provision denying coverage for acts leading to bankruptcy was a prohibited ipso facto clause.

    What Happened?

    Location:

    Market participants invest billions of dollars each year in debt, secured and unsecured. The credit support for the debt would be illusory without carefully crafted covenants that prevent the company from selling or transferring its assets outside the reach of creditors. Reliance on these covenants is critical for investors.

    Location: