If a judgment has been entered against you, the judgment creditor may ask you provide them with a financial statement and copies of your bank statements and pay slips. You may be wondering what power the judgment creditor has to require you to provide this information.

The simple answer is, a judgment creditor can utilise the various enforcement procedures to obtain evidence of your financial situation to assist them with recovering the judgment debt from you.

Examination Notice

The initial consultation — January 2021

In January 2021, the Australian government undertook a public consultation process on possible reforms to the bankruptcy system. The purpose of this consultation was to ensure that Australia’s bankruptcy system was responding to, and addressing, the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic.

This week’s TGIF considers the decision in Re BBY Limited (Receivers and Managers Appointed) (in liq) [2022] NSWSC 29, where the Court discussed the necessary elements of a Quistclose trust in the context of alleged unfair preferences.

Key Takeaways

In brief

The courts were busy in the second half of 2021 with developments in the space where insolvency law and environmental law overlap.

In Victoria, the Court of Appeal has affirmed the potential for a liquidator to be personally liable, and for there to be a prospective ground to block the disclaimer of contaminated land, where the liquidator has the benefit of a third-party indemnity for environmental exposures.¹

This week’s TGIF considers the decision of Wallace (Liquidator), in the matter of Avestra Asset Management Ltd (In Liq) v Dempsey [2021] FCA 1643 in which the Court granted liquidators leave to amend their pleading following a mistake in the naming of the plaintiff.

Key Takeaways

It is uncontroversial that:

Industry insolvencies are expected to increase in the construction industry in 2022. I will discuss in this article how Project Trusts will impact affected parties.

The legislation giving effect to Trusts, the Building Industry Fairness (Security of Payment) Act 2017(BIFA), was initially based on the establishment of ‘Project Bank Accounts’ (PBAs).

In its recent decision in Morton as Liquidator of MJ Woodman Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Metal Manufacturers Pty Limited [2021] FCAFC 228, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia (the Court) held that statutory set-off, under section 553C(1) of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (theAct), is not available to a creditor in respect of a liquidator’s claim against that creditor for the recovery of an unfair preference under s 588FA of the Act.

In Short

The Situation: In the recent decision of Morton as Liquidator of MJ Woodman Electrical Contractors Pty Ltd v Metal Manufacturers Pty Limited [2021] FCAFC 228, the Full Court of the Federal Court of Australia considered the availability of mutual set-off provisions in s 553C the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) as a defence to unfair preference claims.

For some time, controversy has surrounded the question as to whether unsecured creditors of an insolvent company can utilise set-off under s 553C of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) (Act) against unfair preference claims.