This appeal was brought by the insolvency practitioners dealing with the Nortel and Lehman Brothers companies. The Regulator’s Determinations Panel has, in relation to both the Nortel and Lehman Brothers pension schemes, issued warning notices of its intention to issue Financial Support Directions (FSDs) against group companies.
In previous issues of TransAtlantic, we reported that the UK Pensions Regulator had issued contribution notices (CNs) and financial support directions (FSDs) against insolvent companies in the Nortel and Lehman Brothers groups. Click here for the June story on Nortel (see page 5); click here for the November story on Lehman (see page 7).
The High Court has decided that financial support directions can be issued against insolvent companies as well as solvent ones.
The administrators of 20 insolvent companies in the Lehman Brothers and Nortel groups had argued that the Pensions Regulator’s Determinations Panel had no legal power to determine that it would be reasonable to issue FSDs against these companies. The High Court disagreed and decided:
Summary and implications
The Government is proposing to give struggling companies a protected moratorium against enforcement action, to help them to negotiate a restructuring deal with their creditors.
The moratorium would be available to all companies which are preparing a CVA or scheme of arrangement. At present, a moratorium is only available to small companies* who are proposing a CVA.
If an administration order is made and a pending winding-up petition is subsequently dismissed, the costs of that petition are payable as an expense of the administration.1
The Government has announced that it will shortly begin a consultation on important new measures designed to boost confidence in the ‘pre-pack’ administration procedure.
In our September 2009 Pensions update we reported on proposals to make changes to the employer debt regime aimed at assisting corporate restructurings. The final regulations have now been published and come into force on 6 April 2010. Under these provisions, where there is a corporate restructuring and one employer’s assets and pension liabilities are transferred to another, then as long as the prescribed steps (set out below) are followed, no statutory employer debt will arise. Employers relying on an easement will not be expected to seek clearance from the Pensions Regulator.
The PPF policy statement can be found here
Following its November 2009 consultation, the PPF has published a statement confirming its policy on measuring insolvency risk for the 2011/12 levy. Schemes and employers should act quickly before the 30 and 31 March 2010 deadlines.
The policy statement confirms that for the 2011/12 levy year, the PPF will adopt new policies, including:
Summary and implications
Two recent cases involving company administrations have seen the court take very different approaches to an administrator’s demands. The court has shown that it will look at the overall purpose of the administration before deciding whether to allow administrators to use their powers. Clients should consider:
Summary and implications
Whilst the property market remains challenging, the possibility of landlords entering into administration increases and many redevelopment schemes have been put on hold.