Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    PMSI v. Insured
    2009-05-14

    GE financed two tractor trailers for Brampton Leasing & Rentals Ltd. (“Debtor”) under conditional sale contracts and perfected its security under the Personal Property Security Act (Ontario) (“PPSA”).

    The Debtor leased the vehicles to lessees, who obtained vehicle insurance from ING. GE was not named as a loss payee by the Debtor or the lessees.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Miller Thomson LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Misrepresentation, Good faith, Vehicle insurance, Market value, Secured loan, Implied consent, General Electric, ING Group, Personal Property Security Act 1990 (Canada), Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Miller Thomson LLP
    AIG transfers reinsurance dispute to bankruptcy court
    2011-10-06

    Following removal to federal district court of an action against AIG, defendants petitioned to refer the case to the district’s bankruptcy court. Plaintiffs’ claims arose out of a reinsurance arrangement between AIG and non-party The Robert Plan Corporation, who were engaged in the automobile insurance business. After a dispute regarding administration of the reinsurance treaties, plaintiffs – “family members and former shareholders” of TRP – allege TRP agreed to accept a certain sum as payment pursuant to AIG’s allegedly fabricated representations about its loss reserves.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Jorden Burt LLP, Bankruptcy, Shareholder, Reinsurance, Vehicle insurance, American International Group, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    John Black
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jorden Burt LLP
    Lincoln General Insurance Company enters liquidation in Pennsylvania
    2015-11-13

    The Insurance Commissioner of Pennsylvania has placed Lincoln General Insurance Company into liquidation in Pennsylvania. As a result, the Insurance Commissioner as Liquidator takes over the property, business, and affairs of Lincoln General; collects assets; resolves claims; and ultimately, distributes assets to creditors, including policyholders and claimants.

    Filed under:
    USA, Pennsylvania, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Reed Smith LLP, Liquidation, Vehicle insurance, Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
    Authors:
    Timothy P. Law , John N. Ellison
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund not implicated until uninsured motor vehicle coverage is exhausted
    2007-07-27

    On July 12, 2007, the Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court held that, where a vehicle causing an accident is owned by a governmental entity and is insured by an insolvent insurer, the Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund is not obligated to compensate the injured individual unless and until the injured individual's own uninsured motor vehicle coverage has been exhausted. Massachusetts Insurers Insolvency Fund v. Premier Ins. Co., 07-SJC-09793 (July 12, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Locke Lord LLP, Voluntary association, Vehicle insurance, Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Locke Lord LLP
    Supreme Court finds FCRA liability
    2007-11-14

    The United States Supreme Court held that reckless violations of the Fair Credit Reporting Act (“FCRA”) constitute a willful failure to comply, subjecting violators to liability for actual damages, statutory penalties and potentially punitive damages. Safeco Ins. Co. of America v. Burr, 551 U.S. _____ (June 4, 2007).

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Credit history, Punitive damages, Costs in English law, Letter of credit, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Summary offence, Vehicle insurance, Credit score, Consumer privacy, Fair Credit Reporting Act 1970 (USA), Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days