Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Pensions Regulator settles Lehman case
    2014-09-03

    After six years of legal action and investigations, the Pensions Regulator (TPR) has agreed a £184 million settlement with PwC, administrators for the Lehman Brothers Group, which has secured members' benefits under the UK pension scheme.  It also means the scheme will not go into the Pension Protection Fund (PPF).

    Following the insolvency of the Lehman group in 2008, TPR began regulatory action in 2010 seeking the issue of a Financial Support Direction (FSD) to certain UK group companies.  An FSD requires recipients to provide extra financial support to a scheme.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Burges Salmon LLP, The Pensions Regulator (UK), Lehman Brothers, Pension Protection Fund
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Burges Salmon LLP
    UK Government consults on mandatory supply of IT services to insolvent customers
    2014-07-24

    The UK Government has released a long awaited consultation document proposing new controls on IT suppliers’ dealings with customers facing insolvency.

    To a degree this brings the termination provisions of the UK’s insolvency rescue regimes (administration and company voluntary arrangements) in line with some other jurisdictions, such as the US, which, broadly, do not allow supplier termination for customer insolvency.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, DLA Piper
    Authors:
    Duncan Pithouse , Tim Dawson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    Bache & Ors v Zurich Insurance PLC
    2014-07-29

    Whether insurer liable to repay purchasers’ deposits following dissolution of developer/policy interpretation

    http://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/TCC/2014/2430.html

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Clyde & Co LLP
    Authors:
    Nigel Brook
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Clyde & Co LLP
    UK client money settlement approved
    2014-08-07

    Key Point

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing
    Authors:
    David Johnson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    UK administration expenses: utility bills do not rank as an expense
    2014-08-07

    Key Point

    Liability for utility bills arising in an administration after trading had ceased did not rank as an expense of the administration.

    The facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Brian Cain
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    VAT: recovery on UK restructuring fees of advisors
    2014-08-07

    Key Point

    The Court of Appeal has held that a UK company undergoing a financial restructuring was not entitled to recover VAT charged by accountants who prepared reports for the company's lenders use during the restructuring process.

    The facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Taylor Wessing, Value added tax, HM Revenue and Customs (UK)
    Authors:
    Brian Cain
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Limitation on relief under UK Cross Border Insolvency Regulations
    2014-08-07

    Key Points

    • Court cannot grant relief under the UK Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (CBIR) where it could not provide such relief in a domestic insolvency.
    • Even if such option were possible, court would not do so where a contract is governed by English law.
    • Possibility of effectively applying provisions of foreign law under the CBIR restricted.

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Amy Patterson
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    UK liquidators challenge the costs of administrator's solicitors
    2014-08-07

    Key points

    Agreements relating to costs in the course of their office could not be set aside by liquidators subsequently appointed.

    The facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, Costs in English law, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Negeen Arasteh
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    PPF entry rules amended to accommodate specific European insolvency events
    2014-08-07

    In the November 2013 edition of Pensions Pieces we referred to the Olympic Airlines case where a UK pension scheme could not qualify for entry to the Pension Protection Fund ('the PPF') because its sponsoring employer was suffering main liquidation proceedings in Greece, and further insolvency proceedings could not be established to satisfy the current entry conditions

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Taylor Wessing
    Authors:
    Mark Smith , Rosalind Connor
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Utilities companies denied power to take priority over other creditors in administration
    2014-08-08

    The High Court of England and Wales handed down judgment last week in the case of Christine Mary Laverty and others as Joint Liquidators of PGL Realisations PLC and others v British Gas Trading Limited [2014] EWHC 2721.  In an important decision for the insolvency industry, it was held that the statutory deemed contracts regime for gas and electricity supply could not be used by utilities companies to gain priority over other creditors.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells
    Authors:
    Mathew Ditchburn , Tim Reid , Deborah Gregory
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 522
    • Page 523
    • Page 524
    • Page 525
    • Current page 526
    • Page 527
    • Page 528
    • Page 529
    • Page 530
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days