Key point

Administrators are entitled to remuneration for the full period of office even where work is carried out outside of the scope set out in proposals agreed by creditors

Facts

On August 11, 2014, a consultation paper regarding the transposition of the Solvency II Directive into the Prudential Regulation Authority PRA (“PRA”) rules was published. The paper sets out changes to the PRA’s rules required to implement the Directive as amended by Omnibus Directive II.

The Supreme Court has recently declined to hear retailer Game’s appeal, ruling that there was no arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered, particularly bearing in mind the case had already been the subject of judicial decision and reviewed on appeal.

“… permission to appeal be refused because the application does not raise an arguable point of law of general public importance which ought to be considered by the Supreme Court…”

Fibria Celulose S/A v. Pan Ocean [2014] EWHC 2124 (Ch)

In a significant case regarding the application of the Cross Border Insolvency Regulations 2006 (“Regulations”), the English High Court decided it would not intervene to prevent termination of an English law contract for insolvency even though such termination was inoperative or invalid under the foreign law governing the insolvency.

When trying to enforce security over property, it is important for a lender to consider the order in which the proceeds of sale will be distributed – a matter decided by the priority of any charges that exist. The general rule is that whichever legal charge is entered onto the charges register has priority, but this isn’t always the case.   

Scenarios where priority may be different 

From April 2015, success fees and After the Event insurance premiums will no longer be recoverable as part of the costs ordered on the successful outcome of insolvency litigation.

However, this will only apply to funding arrangements entered into after April 2015. There is still time for savvy IPs to ensure that current cases can benefit from the current arrangements but in order to do so they will need to take steps now to collect and collate the evidence on which their claims will rely.

In recent Court decisions, the balance between Administrators and Landlords has shifted backward and forwards with great regularity. Both sides have just learned that the goal posts have moved once more.

The judgment from a unanimous Court of Appeal last week has overruled the previous authorities on the issue of whether rent is payable as an expense in an Administration. In light of the decision in Jervis v Pillar Denton Ltd and Others, the decisions in Goldacre and Luminar are no longer of any effect.

Understanding and managing the risks of an insolvent acquisition

OPPORTUNITY ARISES OUT OF ADVERSITY

The recent global financial crisis has seen consumers tighten their belts and the retail industry as a whole has faced increasing pressure. Profits warnings have peppered the financial pages and fashion retailers, in both the budget and luxury sectors, have been subject to formal insolvency processes.

The High Court has recently considered whether to exercise its jurisdiction to hear winding-up petitions brought against two companies incorporated in Saint Vincent and the Grenadines.

The Facts

The High Court has considered whether a former liquidator should be held liable under section 212 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (the “Act”) for misapplying company monies in excess of half a million pounds.

The Facts