Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Costs of compliance with S236 not automatically recoverable from the insolvency estate
    2015-07-16

    RE: HARVEST FINANCE LTD; JACKSON & ANOTHER V CANNONS LAW PRACTICE LLP & OTHERS [2014]

    This case concerns the provision of documentation under s236 IA 1986. The documentation requested by the liquidators was extensive and the Respondents wished to claim their time costs (£40,381) of providing the same.  The Court held that whilst it was within the Court’s jurisdiction to make an order for costs against the insolvent estate, it was not minded to do so in this case.

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Charles Russell Speechlys, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Hanh Nguyen
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Charles Russell Speechlys
    The BoE approach to Solvency II
    2015-07-16

    A speechby Sam Woods of the Bank of England (BoE) says a lot about its approach to Solvency II and leaves a lot more unsaid.

    Woods said that he wanted to dispel two myths:

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Solvency II Directive (2009/138/EU)
    Authors:
    Geoffrey Maddock
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Collateral purpose in winding-up petitions
    2015-07-16

    ASTRA RESOURCES PLC V CREDIT VERITAS USA LLC [2015] EWHC 1830 (CH)

    It is trite law that the court will grant an injunction restraining the advertisement of a winding-up petition where the petition amounts to an abuse of process.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Charles Russell Speechlys, Abuse of process, Liquidation
    Authors:
    Simon Ridpath
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Charles Russell Speechlys
    Administrators and the statutory purpose
    2015-07-16

    E: BW ESTATES LTD; RANDHAWA AND ANOTHER V TURPIN AND ANOTHER [2015] EWHC 517 (CH) (“RVT”)

    This decision followed an application by creditors (“the Randhawas”) of BW Estates Ltd (“the Company”) against the administrators of the Company that their remuneration should be deemed excessive and either disallowed entirely or reduced to such extent as the court thought appropriate.

    The Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Charles Russell Speechlys
    Authors:
    Daniel Moore
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Charles Russell Speechlys
    Arbitrate before you litigate!
    2015-07-17

    Over the last seven months there has been a spate of cases dealing with the relationship between arbitration law and insolvency law.

    Winding-up petitions and arbitration clauses

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Arbitration clause, Court of Appeal of England & Wales
    Authors:
    Susan Kelly , Siân Taylor
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Trustee’s liability for adverse costs orders incurred by bankrupt pre- bankruptcy
    2015-07-17

    RE: BPE SOLICITORS & ANOTHER V GABRIEL [2015] UKSC 39 

    The Supreme Court considered whether a trustee in bankruptcy who was considering adopting proceedings and lodging an appeal should be personally liable for historic adverse costs which had been awarded against the bankrupt prior to the commencement of the bankruptcy.

    A Trustee in Bankruptcy’s liability for litigation costs

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Charles Russell Speechlys, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Solicitor, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Simon Ridpath , Ashley Armitage
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Charles Russell Speechlys
    Amendments to UK insolvency legislation
    2015-07-17

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Brown Rudnick LLP, Liquidation, Insolvency Act 1986 (UK)
    Authors:
    Louise Verrill , Paul Durban , Joe Speakman , Henry Kikoyo
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Brown Rudnick LLP
    Contractual ramifications of conditional fee arrangements for office-holders
    2015-07-17

    Stevensdrake Ltd v Stephen Hunt & Others [2015] EWHC 1527 (Ch)

    Introduction

    The High Court’s recent judgment in Stevensdrake Ltd -v- Stephen Hunt & Others highlights the need for Insolvency Practitioners to make sure that they carefully review conditional fee arrangements before entering into them and understand the potential contractual ramifications which may give rise to personal liability.

    Background

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Charles Russell Speechlys, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Melania Constable , Aziz Abdul
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Charles Russell Speechlys
    Filling a lacuna in the UK investment bank special administration regulations 2011 (IBSAR)
    2015-07-08

    Key point

    The Joint special administrators of an investment banking entity succeed in obtaining a direction to allow them to distribute client assets quickly.

    Facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing, Investment banking, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)
    Authors:
    Brian Cain
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing
    Guidance on when the court "ought" to set aside a statutory demand
    2015-07-08

    Key point

    A statutory demand designed to achieve some connected or collateral purpose is not necessarily invalid.

    The facts

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Taylor Wessing
    Authors:
    Richard Colebourn
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Taylor Wessing

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 504
    • Page 505
    • Page 506
    • Page 507
    • Current page 508
    • Page 509
    • Page 510
    • Page 511
    • Page 512
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days