Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    New Delaware Chapter 11 Filing - Marsh Supermarkets Holding, LLC
    2017-05-11

    Marsh Supermarkets Holding, LLC, and 15 of its affiliates, has filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware (Lead Case No. 17-11066-BLS). The petition lists between $0 and $50,000 in assets and between $50 and $100 million in liabilities.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cole Schotz PC, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Cole Schotz PC
    FAQ: Recent Developments in US Law Affecting Pension and OPEB Claims in Restructurings (2017)
    2017-05-11

    From theory to practice, planning to enforcement, the answers to 42 of the most frequently asked questions can help you prepare, cope or respond to a restructuring. This Client Alert answers some of the most frequently asked questions with respect to the treatment of pension-plan liabilities and other post-employment benefits (OPEB) obligations in US bankruptcies. Understanding the treatment of pension and OPEB obligations in bankruptcy continues to be important in today’s business environment and the law relating to the treatment of these obligations continues to evolve.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Latham & Watkins LLP, Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Latham & Watkins LLP
    US Bankruptcy Court Enforces CDO Transaction Flip Clauses
    2017-05-08

    This article was published in a slightly different form in the November 2016 issue of Futures & Derivatives Law by The Journal on the Law of Investment & Risk Management Products.

    Introduction

    Filed under:
    USA, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White & Case, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Ian Cuillerier , David Thatch , Richard Graham , Rhys Bortignon
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    White & Case
    Nicholson v. Hyundai Capital America, Inc.
    2017-05-08

    (W.D. Ky. May 2, 2017)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Court Guts Lyondell Trustee’s Bankruptcy-Related Claims
    2017-05-08

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York, after a lengthy trial, dismissed on April 21, 2017 a litigation trustee’s multibillion-dollar bankruptcy-related claims arising out of a December 2007 merger, finding that:

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Third Circuit Tells Construction Suppliers to “Play by the Rules” of Bankruptcy
    2017-05-08

    In an opinion by Judge Roth issued on March 30, 2017, the Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held that two suppliers who had sold electrical materials to a bankrupt contractor had violated the automatic stay by asserting a construction lien against the owner of the development where the contractor had installed the materials supplied.

    Filed under:
    USA, Construction, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Squire Patton Boggs, Bankruptcy, Supply chain, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Aditi Kulkarni-Knight
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Squire Patton Boggs
    Bankruptcy Settlements Post-Jevic: Potential New Requirements for Priority-Altering Settlements
    2017-05-09

    As noted in a recent Distressing Matters post, the United States Supreme Court in In re Jevic Holding Corp. held that debtors cannot use structured dismissals to make payments to creditors in violation of ordinary bankruptcy distribution priority rules.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mintz
    Who Knew? An Absolute Assignment of Rents Can Be Absolute
    2017-05-09

    Sixth Circuit Determines that an Absolute Assignment of Rents Perfected Under Michigan State Law Takes Property out of a Bankruptcy Estate (In Re Town Center Flats, LLC, Case No. 16-1812 — Decided May 2, 2017)

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Seyfarth Shaw LLP, Sixth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Seyfarth Shaw LLP
    ERISA Benefits and a Claimant’s Bankruptcy: When Judicial Estoppel Requires Dismissal of Lawsuits Seeking Long Term Disability Benefits
    2017-05-09

    Don’t forget that ….

    judicial estoppel can require dismissal of a claimant’s suit for ERISA-governed long term disability (LTD) benefits if the claimant failed to list the “potential cause of action” in bankruptcy filings.

    The key is to determine when the “potential cause of action” accrued. And a recent case says those claims “accrue” when the claimant receives the initial benefit denial letter.

    Filed under:
    USA, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Lane Powell PC, Bankruptcy, Employee Retirement Income Security Act 1974 (USA)
    Authors:
    D. Michael Reilly
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Lane Powell PC
    Jevic: Breathing New Life Into Priority Disputes
    2017-05-09

    In our article, Jevic: The Supreme Court Gives Structure to Chapter 11 Structured Dismissal, we discussed the narrow holding of Czyzewski et al., v. Jevic Holding Corp., et al., 137 S. Ct. 973, 985 (2017) (“Jevic”), which prohibits non-consensual structured dismissals that violate the Bankruptcy Code’s priority principles.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Bracewell LLP
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Bracewell LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 531
    • Page 532
    • Page 533
    • Page 534
    • Current page 535
    • Page 536
    • Page 537
    • Page 538
    • Page 539
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days