Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    The U.S. Supreme Court Rules That Rejection of a Trademark License Agreement in Bankruptcy Does Not Strip the Licensee of Its Right to Use the Trademark
    2019-08-19

    In Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC, 139 S. Ct. 652, 2019 WL 2166392 (U.S. May 20, 2019), the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the rejection in bankruptcy of a trademark license agreement, which constitutes a breach of the agreement under section 365(g) of the Bankruptcy Code, does not terminate the rights of the licensee that would survive the licensor’s breach under applicable non-bankruptcy law.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Jones Day, Debtor, US Congress, Title 11 of the US Code, Eighth Circuit, Supreme Court of the United States, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Ben Rosenblum , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Benefits of Protected Contracts: Utilizing Repurchase Facilities and Securities Contracts as an Alternative to Standard Lending Arrangements
    2019-08-20

    In the United States, in a typical plain vanilla lending arrangement, if a counterparty files for bankruptcy, an automatic stay of enforcement actions is imposed that would prevent a lender from (i) foreclosing on the property of the debtor, (ii) terminating contracts with the debtor, (iii) commencing or continuing certain enforcement actions against the debtor or its property and/or (iv) setting off amounts owed under such arrangements (in each case unless a motion is filed and granted in the related bankruptcy case).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Mayer Brown, Debtor
    Authors:
    Susannah L. Schmid , Todd N. Bundrant , Monique J. Mulcare , Eric M. Reilly
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    SDNY Distinguishes Supreme Court, Holds Tribune Company’s Leveraged Buyout Falls Within Section 546(e) Safe Harbor Provision
    2019-08-20

    The District Court for the Southern District of New York has ruled that a trustee could not amend a complaint to add federal constructive fraudulent transfer claims because those claims were preempted by the safe harbor provision of the Bankruptcy Code.[1]  The District Court found, under a plain language reading of the safe harbor provision, 11 U.S.C.

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    Kevin C. Maclay , Todd E. Phillips , Nathaniel R. Miller
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Caplin & Drysdale, Chartered
    Third Circuit Denies Defendants’ Request for Unlimited Access to Exhibits Submitted to Bankruptcy Trusts U.S. Court of Appeals, Third Circuit, August 19, 2019
    2019-08-21

    Defendants Honeywell and Ford Motor appealed the District Court’s decision affirming the denial of “unconditional access” to numerous exhibits submitted in connection with “administering nine asbestos bankruptcies.” The court had previously permitted review of the documents for three months with certain limitations.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Goldberg Segalla LLP, Third Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Goldberg Segalla LLP
    Insurance Company Cannot Deny D&O Coverage for Acts Causing Bankruptcy
    2019-08-23

    The Bottom Line

    In CMH Liquidating Trust v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, PA, Case No. 16-cv-14434 (E.D. Mich. 2019) (“CMH”), the District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan held that an insurance policy that was renewed post-petition was still an executory contract, and thus, a provision denying coverage for acts leading to bankruptcy was a prohibited ipso facto clause.

    What Happened?

    Filed under:
    USA, Michigan, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for Eastern District of Michigan
    Authors:
    Nancy M. Bello
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Bankruptcy Court Clarifies Requirements for Recognition of a Foreign Proceeding Under Chapter 15
    2019-08-23

    The Bottom Line

    In In re PT Bakrie Telecom Tbk, Ch. 11 Case No. 18-10200 (SHL) (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 30, 2019), the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York denied a noteholder group’s request for summary judgment seeking denial of recognition of a foreign proceeding under Chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code because the debtor had sufficient property in the United States, the appointment of the foreign representative was effective and the Indonesian proceeding was a collective one.

    What Happened?

    Filed under:
    USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Authors:
    Nancy M. Bello
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP
    Windstream Lease Dispute Escalates as Debtors Sue Uniti, Mediator Appointed, and Creditors Intervene
    2019-08-26

    In recent weeks, the dispute in Windstream’s bankruptcy between Windstream and its REIT spinoff Uniti Group over the lease transaction that ultimately led to Windstream’s chapter 11 bankruptcy has continued to escalate with Windstream filing an adversary complaint against Uniti. In its complaint, Windstream seeks to recharacterize the lease as a disguised financing alleging that the lease resulted in a long-term transfer of billions of dollars to Uniti to the detriment of Windstream’s creditors.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Real Estate, Mayer Brown, Debtor, Mediation, Secured creditor, Unsecured creditor
    Authors:
    Tyler R. Ferguson , Aaron Gavant , Sean T. Scott
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    New Law More than Doubles Chapter 12 "Family Farmer" Debt Limit
    2019-08-26

    On Friday, August 23, 2019, the President signed into law the Family Farmer Relief Act of 2019.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ward and Smith, PA, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Lance P. Martin
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Ward and Smith, PA
    President Signs HAVEN Act to Assist Veterans in Bankruptcy Matters
    2019-08-26

    President Donald Trump on Aug. 23, 2019, signed the Honoring American Veterans in Extreme Need Act of 2019 (HAVEN Act) into law. The HAVEN Act was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives by Lucy McBath (D-Ga.) and Greg Steube (R-Fla.) to exclude disability benefits paid by the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs and the U.S. Department of Defense from the calculation of an individual debtor's disposable income used for bankruptcy means testing.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Holland & Knight LLP, US Department of Defense
    Authors:
    Noel Robert Boeke , Daniel T. Sylvester
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Holland & Knight LLP
    New Bankruptcy Laws Offer Hope for Small Businesses, Family Farmers and Service Members
    2019-08-26

    Over the years, much has been written about the Bankruptcy Code’s treatment of small businesses, and the American Bankruptcy Institute Commission’s testimony to Congress this summer made clear that the existing law fell short of providing necessary relief for small businesses. For example, of the 18,000 small business bankruptcy cases filed between 2008 and 2015, less than 27% of those cases resulted in confirmed plans of reorganization. And these numbers excluded countless small businesses that, for a variety of reasons, did not or could not seek bankruptcy relief. See Robert J.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Dykema Gossett PLLC, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code
    Authors:
    Aaron M. Kaufman
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Dykema Gossett PLLC

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 349
    • Page 350
    • Page 351
    • Page 352
    • Current page 353
    • Page 354
    • Page 355
    • Page 356
    • Page 357
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days