Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Third Circuit refines break-up standard
    2010-02-04

    Break-up fees1 remain difficult for initial (or so-called “stalking horse”) bidders to obtain in the Third Circuit. In Kelson Channelview LLC v. Reliant Energy Channelview LP (In re Reliant Energy Channelview LP), No. 09-2074 (3d Cir. Jan.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Shareholder, Debtor, Limited liability company, Testimony, Bright-line rule, Business judgement rule, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Lawrence V. Gelber , James T. Bentley
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Administrators for Lehman Brothers Europe to make claim for client money and assets held by Lehman Brothers Inc.
    2009-01-22

    The Administrators of Lehman Brothers International (Europe) (in administration) (“LBIE”), acting as LBIE’s agent and without personal liability, have advised that they will be filing an omnibus claim on behalf of LBIE and LBIE’s customers against Lehman Brothers Inc. (“LBI”) in its liquidation proceedings under the Securities Investor Protection Act of 1970 (“SIPA”).  

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Collateral (finance), Security (finance), Liquidation, Brokerage firm, Lehman Brothers, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Trustee
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Second Circuit affirms dismissal of employees' lender liability WARN Act suit
    2007-09-28

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on Aug. 30, 2007, affirmed the dismissal of a lender liability class action brought by employees of a defunct originator and seller of mortgages and home equity loans. 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 20791 (2d Cir. August 30, 2007). Agreeing with the district court, the Second Circuit held that the lender was not an "employer" within the meaning of the Worker Adjustment & Retraining Notification Act ("WARN Act"), and thus was not liable to the employees for the sudden loss of their jobs. Id., at *2.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, Fraud, Class action, Interest, Default (finance), Line of credit, US Code, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act 1988 (USA), Second Circuit, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Third Circuit Rejects Side-Switching Disqualification Claim
    2022-07-25

    The Third Circuit recently affirmed the bankruptcy court's approved retention of the debtor's counsel ("S") when that "law firm dropped an existing client to avoid conflicts that would prevent it from taking on a more lucrative client [i.e., the debtor]." In re Boy Scouts of America, 2022 WL 1634643, *7 (3d Cir. May 24, 2022) (BSA). According to the court, there were "not enough facts to put [the so-called "hot potato" doctrine] into play" and disqualify S under the Rules of Professional Conduct. Id.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Update on Business Bankruptcy Legal Fees and Professionalism
    2021-06-11

    "`Staggering' legal fees in Boy Scouts Bankruptcy Case." So read the title of an article in The New York Times on May 11, 2021. According to the reporter, a "lawyer negotiating a resolution to the multi-billion dollar bankruptcy filed by the Boy Scouts of America billed $267,435 in a single month. Another charged $1,725 for each hour of work. New lawyers fresh out of law school have been billing at an hourly rate of more than $600." The bankruptcy judge presiding over the case has called the fee totals "staggering," said the reporter.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Legal Practice, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Third Circuit Allows Repossessing Secured Lender to Hold Collateral Pending Bankruptcy Stay
    2019-12-18

    “[A] secured creditor [has no] affirmative obligation under the automatic stay to return a debtor’s [repossessed] collateral to the bankruptcy estate immediately upon notice of the debtor’s bankruptcy,” the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit held on Oct. 28, 2019. In re Denby-Peterson, 2019 WL 5538570, 1 (3d Cir. Oct. 28, 2019). Affirming the lower courts, the Third Circuit joined “the minority of our sister courts — the Tenth and D.C. Circuits” with its holding.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Title 11 of the US Code, Third Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Fifth Circuit Blocks Fraudulent Transferee’s Good Faith Defense
    2019-01-16

    “A … transferee [who] received fraudulent transfers with actual knowledge or inquiry notice of fraud or insolvency” loses any “good faith” defense available under the Texas version of the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“TUFTA”), held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit on Jan. 9, 2019. Janvey v. GMAG LLC, 2019 WL 141107, *3 (5th Cir. Jan. 9, 2019) (emphasis added).

    Filed under:
    USA, Texas, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Due diligence, US Securities and Exchange Commission, European Securities and Markets Authority, Fifth Circuit, Texas Supreme Court, U.S. Court of Appeals
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Second Circuit Rejects Arbitration of Debtor’s Asserted Discharge Violation
    2018-04-03

    A bankruptcy court properly denied a bank’s motion to compel arbitration of a debtor’s asserted violation of the court’s discharge injunction, held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on March 7, 2018. In re Anderson, 2018 U.S. App. LEXIS 5703, *20 (2d Cir. March 7, 2018).

    Filed under:
    USA, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Second Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Sixth Circuit Trims Bank’s Good Faith Defense to Fraudulent Transfer Claims
    2017-03-09

    A defendant bank (“Bank”) in a fraudulent transfer suit “could not prove” its “good faith” defense for loan repayments it received after its “investigator discovered [the] fraudulent past” of the Ponzi scheme debtor’s principal but “failed to disclose that past to [the Bank’s account] manager,” held the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit on Feb. 8, 2017. Meoli v. Huntington Nat’l Bank, 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 2248, *28 (6th Cir. Feb. 8, 2017).

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Sixth Circuit, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    Lender’s Derivative Breach of Fiduciary Duty Claim Not Time-Barred Because of Its Knowledge
    2016-07-08

    A lender’s (“Lender”) derivative breach of fiduciary duty claims on behalf of Chapter 7 guarantor-Debtors cannot be time-barred because of Lender’s knowledge of the “[d]efendants’ conduct,” held the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware on June 22, 2016. In re AMC Investors, LLC, 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 80861, *16 (Del. June 22, 2016).

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Credit (finance), Surety, Breach of contract, Fiduciary, Default (finance), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Michael L. Cook
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1780
    • Page 1781
    • Page 1782
    • Page 1783
    • Current page 1784
    • Page 1785
    • Page 1786
    • Page 1787
    • Page 1788
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days