Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Stream TV Networks v. SeeCubic: Delaware court rejects “board only” insolvency exception
    2022-08-24

    In Stream TV Networks, Inc. v. SeeCubic, Inc., the Delaware Supreme Court reversed the Delaware Court of Chancery’s finding that the board of Stream TV Networks, Inc. (Stream) could sell all of Stream’s assets without a stockholder vote due to Stream’s insolvency. The Delaware Supreme Court found that the sale agreement – in essence, a privately structured foreclosure transaction – constituted an “asset transfer” under Stream’s charter, triggering a class vote provision that required the approval of Stream’s Class B stockholders.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, Insolvency, Delaware Court of Chancery, Delaware Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Allison Wuertz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Rehabilitation of Scottish Re: No per se liquidation standard for insurance rehabilitation plans
    2022-08-23

    In In re Rehabilitation of Scottish Re (U.S.), Inc., C.A. No. 2019-0175-JTL (Del. Ch. Apr.18, 2022), the Delaware Court of Chancery ruled, as a matter of first impression, that in a delinquency proceeding for an insurance company under Delaware law, there is no per se requirement that a rehabilitation plan meet a “liquidation standard” to obtain court approval. Under the “liquidation standard,” a rehabilitation plan must provide claimants at least “liquidation value,” or the value they would have received in a liquidation proceeding.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Hogan Lovells, SCOTUS, Delaware Court of Chancery
    Authors:
    Ryan M. Philp , Allison Wuertz
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Hogan Lovells
    Actions speak as loud as words in Deprizio waivers
    2015-05-27

    On May 6, 2015, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit considered whether so-called“Deprizio waivers,”1 where an insider guarantor waives indemnification rights against a debtor, can insulate the guarantor from preference liability arising from payments made by the obligor to the lender. The Ninth Circuit held that if such a waiver is made legitimately—not merely to avoid preference liability—then the guarantor is not a “creditor” and cannot be subject to preference liability.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Surety, Debtor, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    District Court holds the existence of arbitration clause in agreement at issue is insufficient grounds for withdrawing reference
    2015-03-26

    On March 10, 2015, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Alabama issued a memorandum decision in the case of Harrelson v. DSS, Inc. (No. 14-mc-03675), declining to withdraw the reference from the bankruptcy court and holding that the existence of an arbitration agreement and a class action waiver in that arbitration agreement did not require substantial consideration of the Federal Arbitration Act (FAA).

    Facts

    Filed under:
    USA, Alabama, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Debtor, Arbitration clause, Class action, Federal Arbitration Act 1926 (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Rare Earth and Modern Land Chapter 15 recognition and the discharge of New York law governed debt
    2022-09-29

    Summary

    The Hong Kong Court and the US Bankruptcy Court have made conflicting comments regarding the discharge of New York law-governed debt by a foreign scheme of arrangement, where that scheme is the subject of recognition under Chapter 15 of the US Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    Hong Kong, USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mayer Brown, Insolvency, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Alexandra Wood , Adam C. Paul , John M. Marsden , Devi Shah
    Location:
    Hong Kong, USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    Subchapter V Trustee Role in Chapter 11 Bankruptcy
    2022-10-12

    Chapter 11 Subchapter V cases are a relatively new animal in the bankruptcy world. Subchapter V was added to Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in February 2020 to provide an efficient and cost-effective alternative process for small businesses wishing to organize under Chapter 11.

    Unlike regular Chapter 11 business reorganizations, Subchapter V provides for the appointment of a trustee. However, Subchapter V provides little detail about the role of these trustees. This article discusses how one court dealt with this ambiguity.

    Background

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLC
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Frost Brown Todd LLC
    Bankruptcy Judge = A Mediator in the Judge’s Own Court: An Old and Meritorious Idea
    2022-10-11

    Many years ago, back when mediation is a rarity in bankruptcy disputes, I asked an old-timer this question:

    Why is the bankruptcy system a lagging adopter of mediation?”

    A Surprising Answer

    The old-timer gave this surprising answer:

    “At the time of the Bankruptcy Code’s enactment, the bankruptcy judge was viewed as a mediator in the judge’s own court.”

    The old-timer added this.  When the Bankruptcy Code was enacted:

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Koley Jessen PC, Bankruptcy, Mediation, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    When it Comes to Assuming Executory Contracts, a Default is a Default; But the Equities Still Matter
    2022-10-10

    The recent decision of the Ninth Circuit in In re Hawkeye Entertainment, LLC contains a few important takeaways with respect to the treatment of executory contracts and unexpired leases under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP, Ninth Circuit
    Authors:
    Jeffrey A. Krieger
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Greenberg Glusker Fields Claman & Machtinger LLP
    When it Comes to Assuming Executory Contracts, a Default is a Default; But the Equities Still Matter
    2022-10-10

    The recent decision of the Ninth Circuit in In re Hawkeye Entertainment, LLC contains a few important takeaways with respect to the treatment of executory contracts and unexpired leases under section 365 of the Bankruptcy Code.

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Ninth Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Commodities Bulletin, October 2022
    2022-10-07

    Welcome to the October 2022 edition of the HFW Commodities bulletin.

    In this extended edition, a number of our partners from across the globe have taken time to reflect on the profound impact of the Russian invasion of Ukraine on the commodities sector. It includes contributions from our offices in Australia, Geneva, London and Singapore, with articles on energy and food security, sanctions, insolvency, regulation, the energy transition and force majeure.

    On the back page, you will find details of the latest news and where you can meet the team next.

    Filed under:
    Australia, European Union, Global, Russia, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA, Company & Commercial, Derivatives, Energy & Natural Resources, Insolvency & Restructuring, Product Regulation & Liability, Trade & Customs, Supply chain, Mediation, Due diligence, Force majeure, Sanctions, ESG, Coronavirus, Anti-bribery and corruption, Foreign Corrupt Practices Act 1977 (USA), European Commission, US Department of Justice, Office of Foreign Assets Control (USA), Commodity Futures Trading Commission (USA), Bank of England
    Authors:
    Justine Barthe-Dejean
    Location:
    Australia, European Union, Global, Russia, Ukraine, United Kingdom, USA

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 1448
    • Page 1449
    • Page 1450
    • Page 1451
    • Current page 1452
    • Page 1453
    • Page 1454
    • Page 1455
    • Page 1456
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days