Key Points

• A dividend is a ‘transaction’ and therefore can be challenged under s 423 IA 86
• A duty to act in the best interests of creditors does not arise simply because there is a risk of insolvency which is not ‘remote’

The Facts

Summary

Court of Appeal has confirmed that a bankrupt cannot be compelled to draw down pension rights for the benefit of creditors.

Facts

Following the supportive High Court decision in the case of Raithatha v Williamson [2012] EWHC 900 (Ch), the trustee in bankruptcy in this case applied for an order compelling a discharged bankrupt to draw down his pension rights for the benefit of his creditors.

With the aim of improving transparency around ownership and control of companies, all UK unquoted and limited liability partnerships are required to maintain new registers of People with Significant Control (PSC). The details should be recorded in the company’s own PSC register and are to be filed at Companies House.

Anyone who satisfies at least one of the following conditions:

The Fatcs

A gift card retailer entered creditors’ voluntary liquidation with an estimated deficiency of £2.8 million. The liquidators subsequently sought declarations that various categories of payments made to the wife of the sole director and shareholder of the company, who was employed as its book keeper, constituted transactions at an undervalue. Mrs Lawson claimed that the payments, which were made to a joint bank account in her and Mr Lawson’s name, were made to discharge expense claims.

The Decision

Key Points

The Facts

The applicants were judgment creditors of a Robert Williams (Robert). They obtained a charging order against Roberts’s beneficial interest in 75% of the shares in a company in administration and eventually became full legal owners of those shares.

The Facts

In December 2015, Hart J heard (and refused) an application by Mr Golstein for revocation of a decision of 31 May 2012 passing a proposal by Mr Bishop to enter into an Individual Voluntary Arrangement (IVA). Mr Golstein, who was claiming a sum of £122,000 from Mr Bishop, appealed the decision on the basis that his claim was not correctly admitted for voting purposes and that there was material non-disclosure by Mr Bishop which led to the passing of the IVA.

The Decision

In the May 2015 edition of Pensions Priorities we reported on a case where the High Court found that an agreement dealing with the costs associated with the secondment of employees between group companies included liability for the receiving company to pay for the section 75 debt arising in relation to the seconded employees.

Long service changes

Having launched the original version three years ago, we have refreshed our Safeguarding Your Business guide as an eBook. The guide assists clients in protecting themselves either proactively or reactively in respect of a counterparty’s insolvency with new sections on trusts and examples of how we have helped, using some of the principles raised.