Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Spradlin v. Khouri (In re Bruner)
    2017-01-06

    (6th Cir. B.A.P. Jan. 4, 2017)

    The Sixth Circuit B.A.P. affirms the bankruptcy court’s decision and order denying the trustee’s request for turnover of funds paid to the debtor’s criminal defense attorney. The debtor’s mother had made the transfer from a bank account held jointly with the debtor. The trustee failed to meet the burden of proving by a preponderance of the evidence that the attorney fee was property of the estate, and thus turnover was inappropriate. Because the debtor had no claim to the fee, the trustee had no claim for turnover. Opinion below.

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Sixth Circuit
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Smith v. Capital One Bank (USA), N.A.
    2017-01-02

    (7th Cir. Dec. 22, 2016)

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Seventh Circuit
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Crawford v. Vanwinkle (In re Vanwinkle)
    2017-01-02

    (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Dec. 27, 2016)

    The bankruptcy court dismisses the creditor’s non-dischargeability complaint under 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(2)(A) and (a)(6). The creditor conceded that the debt was based on a breach of contract claim. However, the creditor alleged the debt was converted to a non-dischargeable debt based on the debtor’s post-judgment efforts to avoid collection. The court finds that the creditor failed to state a claim in part because the alleged behavior did not result in the debt sought to be declared non-dischargeable. Opinion below.

    Judge: Schaaf

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Hollowell v. JPMorgan Chase National Association
    2017-01-02

    (N.D. Ind. Dec. 22, 2016)

    The district court affirms the bankruptcy court’s order lifting the stay to permit the creditor to proceed with the real property foreclosure action. The debtor failed to provide factual or legal support for his claims of fraud by the creditor. Opinion below.

    Judge: Miller

    Plaintiff: Pro Se

    Attorneys for Defendants: Dykema Gossett PLLC, Jordan S. Huttenlocker, Louis S. Chronowski

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, JPMorgan Chase
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    In re Perkins
    2017-01-02

    (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Dec. 22, 2016)

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Loventhal v. Edelson
    2017-01-02

    (7th Cir. Dec. 21, 2016)

    The Seventh Circuit affirms the bankruptcy court’s judgment that certain real property of the debtor was exempt because it was held in a tenancy by the entirety under Illinois law. The creditor argued that the tenancy by the entirety was severed when the real property had been transferred to a trust prepetition. The Seventh Circuit examines applicable Illinois statutes and concludes that the transfer did not sever the tenancy by the entirety. Opinion below

    Judge: Posner

    Attorney for Debtor: Kofkin Law, Scott J. Kofkin

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    In re McCoy
    2016-12-05

    (6th Cir. B.A.P. Nov. 29, 2016)

    Filed under:
    USA, Ohio, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Sixth Circuit
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Security Seed and Chemical, Inc. v. French (In re French)
    2016-12-05

    (Bankr. W.D. Ky. Dec. 1, 2016)

    Following trial, the bankruptcy court excepts from discharge a debt arising from a loan, but holds the plaintiff failed to meet its burden with respect to other debts. The court also finds that a lien was not created where there was no proof of an actual levy, but a seperate judgment lien is held valid. The court denies the debtor’s motion to avoid the lien. Opinion below.

    Judge: Stout

    Attorneys for Plaintiff: Thomas, Arvin & Adams, James G. Adams, III, David E. Arvin

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Oaks v. Miller (In re Miller)
    2016-12-07

    (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Dec. 6, 2016)

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC, Punitive damages, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Nelson v. Taylor (In re Taylor)
    2016-12-05

    (Bankr. E.D. Ky. Nov. 28, 2016)

    The bankruptcy court enters summary judgment in favor of the plaintiffs in this 11 U.S.C. § 523(a)(6) nondischargeability action. The plaintiffs had obtained a state court default judgment against the debtor for damages caused to them when the debtor drove to their home and shot one of the plaintiffs and injured the other plaintiff with flying debris. The court holds that collateral estoppel bars the debtor from relitigating the issue of whether the debtor caused a willful and malicious injury to the plaintiffs. Opinion below.

    Judge: Wise

    Filed under:
    USA, Kentucky, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC
    Authors:
    Matt Lindblom
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Stoll Keenon Ogden PLLC

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 6
    • Page 7
    • Page 8
    • Page 9
    • Current page 10
    • Page 11
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days