Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    When must a liquidator seek approval? Section 477(2B) and cost agreements
    1969-12-31
    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, KHQ Lawyers, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Jacqueline Wilcock , Kathryn Lechner , Paul Welling
    Firm:
    KHQ Lawyers
    Pay up, kick up or be wound up: the 411 on statutory demands
    2025-12-04

    Creditors’ statutory demands are a very powerful, and commonly used weapon by creditors.  They are cheap and easy to issue, and the consequences for not dealing with one appropriately can be extremely serious – i.e. liquidation.

    Because of this, the courts enforce strict compliance with the requirements imposed on a party seeking to rely on one, so creditors should ensure they are up to date on those requirements.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, KHQ Lawyers, Liquidation, Australian Securities and Investments Commission, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
    Authors:
    Jordan Diamantopoulos , Tamara Parker , Paul Welling
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    KHQ Lawyers
    Respondent unsuccessful in defeating SoPA rights of insolvent claimants
    2023-03-22

    Industry participants who are close watchers of the different States’ and Territories’ security of payment regimes may have noticed a divergence between NSW and Victorian security of payment law in relation to failing corporate claimants. A recent NSW case regarding a head contractor’s unsuccessful challenge to the continuation of a deed of company arrangement may perpetuate a divergence in security of payment law in the context of insolvency.

    Background – NSW law

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Victoria, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, KHQ Lawyers, Supreme Court of the United States, New South Wales Supreme Court , New South Wales Court of Appeal
    Authors:
    Catherine Bell
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    KHQ Lawyers
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days