The Land and Conveyancing Law Reform (Amendment) Act 2019 (the “Act”) introduces a list of factors that must be taken into consideration by the Court before an order for possession can be granted or refused. The Act builds upon the protections given to borrowers under the Personal Insolvency legislation, which allows the Court to adjourn proceedings to facilitate a borrower getting a proposal together for a Personal Insolvency Arrangement (“PIA”).
When a company is unable to pay its debts as they fall due, a director’s duties shift from the management of the company for the benefit of the shareholders, to ensuring the company’s creditors are not disadvantaged by the company continuing to trade.
The directors should seek and comply with professional advice from their auditors and solicitors regarding any decision to continue trading for an interim period.
“To achieve great things, two things are needed: a plan, and not quite enough time.” – Leonard Bernstein
To paraphrase, great things happen when there is a plan and a deadline.
Examinership is one of Ireland’s key rescue processes for insolvent companies. It has been used successfully in very many cases since its introduction almost 20 years ago.
Crucially, it encompasses a deadline with no flexibility.
100 days
A recent English Court of Appeal decision has held that legal advice privilege, once established, remains in existence unless and until it is waived. Whether there is no one to waive it; or whether the Crown could have waived it but has not done so; does not matter.
What was the Background to the Case?
The default setting for the hearing of many contested debt recovery and security enforcement cases is by way of affidavit evidence, particularly in the High Court[1]. The creditor swears an affidavit setting out the reasons why it maintains the court should rule in its favour. Certain documents can be presented as exhibits that back up its case such as a contract.
It is now well documented that many owners’ management companies are facing the prospect of litigating to recover the cost of remedial works for defective developments or passing the cost onto the owners themselves. Given the passage of time since the construction of the developments and the insolvency of many of the developers and contractors involved in those projects following the financial crisis, management companies often face an uphill battle to recover damages.
In 2018 the Supreme Court delivered its much-awaited decision in the case of SPV OSUS Ltd v HSBC Institutional Trust Services (Ireland) Ltd & Ors where it confirmed that the assignment of a claim is unenforceable in Irish law unless the assignment is ancillary to a bona fide transaction or the assignee has a genuine commercial interest in the assignment.
The recent decision of the Court of Appeal in The Governor and Company of the Bank of Ireland v O'Grady & Anor 2018 IECA 180 has confirmed that where anapplication for summary judgment is made, a defendant must establish that he has "an arguable defence" to the claim if proceedings are to be remitted to plenary hearing.
Background Facts
The sale of gift vouchers and their terms and conditions is largely unregulated in Ireland.
Although there is no specific legislation, gift vouchers provided to consumers are subject to the provisions of general consumer protection legislation, such as the Consumer Protection Act 2007.
Gift vouchers that cover a wide range of traders and retailers such as the “All4One” vouchers come within the definition of “electronic money” in the European Communities (Electronic Money) Regulations 2011 are subject to the provisions of those Regulations.