Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Imputes Officer's Fraudulent Intent to Corporation in Avoidance Litigation
    2024-01-31

    A powerful tool afforded to a bankruptcy trustee or a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") is the power to recover pre-bankruptcy transfers that are avoidable under federal bankruptcy law (or sometimes state law) because they were either made with the intent to defraud creditors or are constructively fraudulent because the debtor-transferor received less than reasonably equivalent value in exchange and was insolvent at the time, or was rendered insolvent as a consequence of the transfer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Jones Day, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Authors:
    S. Chrstopher Cundra IV (Chris)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Delaware Bankruptcy Court Imputes Officer's Fraudulent Intent to Corporation in Avoidance Litigation
    2024-01-31

    A powerful tool afforded to a bankruptcy trustee or a chapter 11 debtor-in-possession ("DIP") is the power to recover pre-bankruptcy transfers that are avoidable under federal bankruptcy law (or sometimes state law) because they were either made with the intent to defraud creditors or are constructively fraudulent because the debtor-transferor received less than reasonably equivalent value in exchange and was insolvent at the time, or was rendered insolvent as a consequence of the transfer.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Jones Day, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Internal Revenue Code (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    Voter Apathy & Consensual v. Non-Consensual Plan Confirmation In Subchapter V (In re Franco’s)
    2023-10-26

    Here’s the latest opinion on a controversial question: In re Franco’s Paving LLC, Case No. 23-20069, Southern Texas Bankruptcy Court, (decided 10/5/2023; Doc. 74).

    The Question & Answer

    Voter apathy is a problem in Subchapter V cases. That apathy is in the form of creditors failing or refusing to vote on a Subchapter V plan. The In re Franco’s opinion addresses this apathy problem head-on.

    Filed under:
    USA, Nebraska, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Koley Jessen PC, Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Donald L. Swanson
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Koley Jessen PC
    Circuit Split Widens on Extent of Abrogation of Sovereign Immunity for Governmental Units in Bankruptcy Avoidance Litigation
    2023-09-30

    Bankruptcy trustees and chapter 11 debtors-in-possession ("DIPs") frequently seek to avoid fraudulent transfers and obligations under section 544(b) of the Bankruptcy Code and state fraudulent transfer or other applicable nonbankruptcy laws because the statutory "look-back" period for avoidance under many nonbankruptcy laws exceeds the two-year period governing avoidance actions under section 548.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Jones Day, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA), Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Dan B. Prieto , Mark G. Douglas
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Jones Day
    The State of Student Loan Debt in Bankruptcy
    2023-07-21

    On June 30, the Supreme Court ruled that the Biden administration did not have authority to forgive student loans under the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003 (HEROES Act). Despite this defeat, the Biden administration is still working to reduce the burden of student loans. Advocates for student loan relief argue that student loans can be a crushing form of debt in part because of their treatment in bankruptcy. It is the common belief that student loans, unlike other forms of unsecured debt, are not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA), Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Daniel A. Lowenthal , Kimberly Black
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
    The State of Student Loan Debt in Bankruptcy
    2023-07-21

    On June 30, the Supreme Court ruled that the Biden administration did not have authority to forgive student loans under the Higher Education Relief Opportunities for Students Act of 2003 (HEROES Act). Despite this defeat, the Biden administration is still working to reduce the burden of student loans. Advocates for student loan relief argue that student loans can be a crushing form of debt in part because of their treatment in bankruptcy. It is the common belief that student loans, unlike other forms of unsecured debt, are not dischargeable in bankruptcy.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA), Supreme Court of the United States
    Authors:
    Daniel A. Lowenthal , Kimberly Black
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Patterson Belknap Webb & Tyler LLP
    SEC Brings Suit against Independent Trustees, Adviser and Registered Fund Officers
    2023-05-11

    On May 5, 2023, the SEC filed a civil complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of New York against a mutual fund’s adviser for aiding and abetting violations of Rule 22e-4 (the “Liquidity Rule”) by the mutual fund it advised (the “Fund”) and whose Liquidity Risk Management Program (“LRMP”) it administered.

    Filed under:
    USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Ropes & Gray LLP, Liquidity risk, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Securities and Exchange Commission
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Ropes & Gray LLP
    Section 467 Leases: Maximizing Tax Benefits While Minimizing Bankruptcy Risks
    2023-04-20

    As the economy continues to face challenges and the threat of bankruptcy becomes more prevalent among businesses, landlords must be more vigilant in protecting their interests in commercial leases. One area of particular concern is leases that fall under Section 467 of the Internal Revenue Code (“Section 467 Leases”).

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Tax, Shearman & Sterling LLP, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA)
    Authors:
    Kris Ferranti
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Shearman & Sterling LLP
    Silver Linings Playbook: Celsius Bankruptcy Ruling Provides Cryptocurrency Tax Planning Opportunities
    2023-04-12

    Although it’s inaccurate to say that the Chinese character for “crisis” combines the characters for danger and opportunity, the thought has resonated since President Kennedy repeatedly used this trope in his presidential campaign speeches.

    Filed under:
    USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, IT & Data Protection, Tax, Mayer Brown, Cryptocurrency, Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Department of the Treasury
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Mayer Brown
    IRS issues initial guidance for new excise tax on stock buybacks and corporate alternative minimum tax
    2022-12-30

    On December 27, 2022, the IRS issued two notices providing key initial guidance for the new excise tax on corporate stock buybacks and the new corporate alternative minimum tax (CAMT). Both the excise tax and the CAMT were enacted as part of the Inflation Reduction Act that Congress passed in August 2022.1

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Private equity, Excise, SPAC, Internal Revenue Code (USA), Internal Revenue Service (USA), US Congress
    Location:
    USA

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • Page 18
    • Current page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • Page 22
    • Page 23
    • …
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days