Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Ambiguous UCC Collateral Descriptions Part II: Another Snare for Private Equity Companies
    2018-10-25

    On August 20, the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Central District of Illinois in In re I80 Equipment, LLC, No.17-81749, 2018 WL 4006294 (Bankr. C.D. Ill. Aug. 20, 2018) held that a secured party failed to perfect its security interest due to an insufficient description of the collateral listed in its UCC-1 financing statement. The financing statement failed to sufficiently describe the collateral because it referenced the definition of “collateral” in the underlying security agreement without attaching the security agreement to the financing statement.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Private equity, Uniform Commercial Code (USA), United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Deborah J. Enea
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    “Deed in lieu”: deed that is not really in lieu of foreclosure will likely not be treated as a deed
    2015-06-03

    In re Primes, 518 B.R. 466 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2014) –

    A mortgagee moved for relief from the automatic stay, arguing that it acquired title to property prior to the bankruptcy under a quit claim deed given to it by the debtor. However, the bankruptcy court agreed with the debtor that the deed, which was given in connection with a forbearance agreement, should be treated as an equitable mortgage.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Foreclosure, Deed
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Post-confirmation: ignoring court orders is not a good idea
    2015-01-23

    In re Castle Home Builders, Inc., 520 B.R. 98 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2014) –

    The debtors obtained confirmation of plans of reorganization that restructured prepetition mortgage loans.  When the servicer for some of the loans continued to ignore the terms of the plans, the reorganized debtors sought enforcement of the court’s confirmation order and sanctions.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Troutman Pepper, Debtor
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Sale “free and clear”: adequate protection of nothing is nothing
    2014-07-29

    In re Elk Grove Village Petroleum, 510 B.R. 594 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2014) –

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Tax, Troutman Pepper, Debtor, Personal property
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    “Strong arm” powers Round 3: what happens if a mortgage is recorded before a deed?
    2012-09-20

    Olsen v. Heaver (In re Heaver), 473 B.R. 734 (Bankr. N.D. Ill. 2012) –

    The short story is that when a deed and mortgage are executed at the same time, but the mortgage is recorded before the deed, the recorded mortgage does not provide constructive notice and can be avoided in a bankruptcy – at least under Illinois law as interpreted by the Heaver bankruptcy court.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Troutman Pepper, Mortgage loan, Deed, Conveyancing, Constructive notice, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Troutman Pepper
    Update on Insider Litigation
    2015-12-10

    The U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois ordered the “equitable subordination” of insider secured claims against a Chapter 11 debtor on Nov.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP
    FDIC creates bridge bank to take over operations of Independent Bankers’ Bank
    2009-12-21

    On Friday, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation – Division of Banking closed Independent Bankers’ Bank, headquartered in Springfield, Illinois, and theFDIC was named as receiver. As receiver, the FDIC created Independent Bankers’ Bank Bridge Bank, National Association to take over the operations of the failed bank.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Alston & Bird LLP, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    MB Financial Bank assumes deposits of Benchmark Bank
    2009-12-07

    On Friday, the Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation - Division of Banking closed Benchmark Bank, headquartered in Aurora, Illinois, and the FDIC was named as receiver.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Alston & Bird LLP, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    MB Financial Bank assumes deposits of InBank
    2009-09-07

    The Illinois Department of Financial and Professional Regulation, Division of Banking, closed InBank, headquartered in Oak Forest, Illinois, and the FDIC was named as receiver. The FDIC entered into a purchase and assumption agreement with MB Financial Bank, N.A., headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, to assume all the deposits of InBank except certain brokered deposits.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Alston & Bird LLP, Investment funds, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA)
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Alston & Bird LLP
    Payments to a REMIC trust find safe harbor, but another storm is brewing…
    2015-08-03

    The Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois issued a noteworthy opinion for those whose work involves real estate mortgage conduit trusts (REMIC trusts) or utilization of the Bankruptcy Code’s “safe harbor” provisions. In In re MCK Millennium Ctr. Parking, LLC,1 Bankruptcy Judge Jacqueline P.

    Filed under:
    USA, Illinois, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Securitization & Structured Finance
    Location:
    USA

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • Current page 18
    • Page 19
    • Page 20
    • Page 21
    • Next page ››
    • Last page Last »
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days