FMLC has responded on aspects of Treasury’s consultations on resolution of investment banks. The paper’s main recommendations include:

Treasury is consulting on how to improve protection and payment of benefits for policyholders of insurers who get into financial difficulty. Historically, few insurers have been put into administration or liquidation, and none have been so seriously affected in the recent crisis. So Treasury thinks it is time to review the regime and suggests changes that would:

The Commission has agreed a plan to split Northern Rock into two banks, a “good” and a “bad” one. The “good” bank will carry on the economic activities of Northern Rock and the “bad” one will be an asset management company that will run down the remaining business. The Commission found the UK Government had kept state aid to a minimum in planning the restructuring. Treasury is pleased with the approval, which it says will allow Northern Rock to return to the mortgage markets while the back book of mortgages is managed separately.

The Investment Banking Insolvency Panel of the FMLC has responded to Treasury’s consultation on developing effective resolution arrangements for investment banks. The response is wide-ranging and looks at clarity, transparency and access before setting out views on client assets and insolvency processes.

Treasury has amended the Financial Markets and Insolvency (Settlement Finality)(Amendment) Regulations 2009 to make the Regulations reflect changes to insolvency and company law that followed the original regulations. The changes take effect on 1 October 2009.

ISDA has written to Treasury on its plans to make insolvency regulations in relation to investment banks. It supports Treasury's plan to take legislative steps only if market practice and regulatory approaches do not work. It endorses the view that sophisticated counterparties should have as much flexibility as possible. It notes the interaction of any regime for investment banks with existing regimes must be clear but does not currently see a compelling case for changes to the current regime.

Summary

FSA is consulting on the need for certain financial services firms to prepare and maintain Recovery and Resolution Plans (RRPs) and in addition for some of these firms, and others, to make further preparations for their investment client money and custody assets (CMA) holdings.

Why now?

Treasury has published the 12 responses it received to its consultation on a special administration regime for investment firms resolution and draft legislation that takes into account its views on the responses. One Order clarifies that the definition of “client assets” includes money, but not money held in respect of insurance mediation. The other sets out the new regime. Respondents broadly supported the proposals and favoured an approach that would require the return of all client money and assets, not just segregated ones.

Treasury makes banking insolvency rules: Treasury has made insolvency and administration rules covering building societies in England and Scotland and amended the English rules on banks in insolvency and administration and the Scottish rules on banking insolvencies. The English rules, among other changes, provide for the statement of proposals to be sent to FSA and FSCS and for the disapplication of set-off for protected deposits up to FSCS's statutory limit. The Scottish instruments apply to insolvencies of banks and building societies under the Banking Act 2009.

Following proposals Treasury made at the end of 2009, it has now published for consultation draft regulations setting up a special resolution regime for investment banks. The regime will apply to firms that meet all of the following three conditions: