Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Court of Appeal accepts Ontario jurisdiction despite forum selection clause for Germany
    2013-06-14

    During the spring of 2012, the Canadian Appeals Monitor posted a five-part series on the Supreme Court’s judgments in Van Breda, Black, and

    Filed under:
    Canada, Ontario, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Breach of contract, Forum selection clause, Court of Appeal for Ontario
    Authors:
    Carole J. Piovesan
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    McCarthy Tétrault LLP
    Decision in DHP Holdings considers forum selection clause in deciding whether to grant motion to change venue
    2010-11-01

    In September of this year, the Honorable Mary F. Walrath, the presiding Judge in the DHP Holdings bankruptcy, issued a decision addressing the effect of a forum selection clause when deciding a motion to change venue. This issue came before the court in an adversary action filed by DHP against The Home Depot. After DHP filed for bankruptcy, the company sued Home Depot for $5.5 million alleging Home Depot owed the company for an outstanding account receivable.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Fraud, Accounts receivable, Federal Reporter, Consideration, Forum selection clause, Prima facie, The Home Depot, Small Business Administration (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Carlyle Investment Management LLC et al. v. Carlyle Capital Corporation Limited, 2011 U.S. Dist. Lexis 85710 (Delaware, August 4, 2011)
    2012-03-21

    Forum selection clause in an investment management agreement is valid and enforceable.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McGuireWoods LLP, Breach of contract, Investment management, Unjust enrichment, Default (finance), Forum selection clause, Mortgage-backed security
    Authors:
    Dana G. Fitzsimons Jr , Adam M. Damerow , Michael H. Barker , Meghan L. Gehr , Justin F. Trent
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    McGuireWoods LLP
    Foreign debtors’ access to U.S. bankruptcy courts: expansion of “property in the United States” definition in chapter 15 cases
    2015-12-01

    When is a foreign entity eligible to file a chapter 15 petition?  This question has been the subject of debate over the last few years, and Judge Martin Glenn’s recent opinion in In re Berau Capital Resources Pte Ltd. will add to this debate.  Although the debtor in the case was foreign and did not have a place of business in the United States, Judge Glenn concluded that the debtor had satisfied the eligibility provisions under section 109(a) of the Bankruptcy Code because the New York choice of law and forum selection clause in the underlying bond indenture rendered the

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP, Debtor, Forum selection clause, Choice of law, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court
    Authors:
    Douglas S. Mintz , Peter Amend , Monica Perrigino
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Orrick, Herrington & Sutcliffe LLP
    Third Circuit tackles ‘core proceedings’ issue
    2009-01-19

    The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has issued a decision that provides an important summary concerning the circumstances under which state law causes of action asserted between nondebtor parties are sufficiently interconnected with claims brought against a debtor to be considered “core proceedings,” which may be determined as part of a bankruptcy case. In re Exide Technologies, 544 F.3d 196 (3d. Cir. 2008).  

    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Reed Smith LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Reporter, Forum selection clause, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Reed Smith LLP
    Recent noteworthy decisions fall 2009
    2009-12-07
    1. In re TOUSA, Inc., 408 B.R. 913 (Bankr. S.D. Fla. 2009). Prepetition lenders could not assert third-party claims against the debtors for breach of contract based on loan document representation that debtor borrowers, on a consolidated basis, would be solvent after the financing transaction because such claims did not depend on the outcome of the fraudulent transfer claims of the creditors, which asserted that individual debtor subsidiaries were insolvent.
    2. In re Metaldyne Corp., 409 B.R. 671 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2009).
    Filed under:
    USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP, Credit (finance), Debtor, Collateral (finance), Breach of contract, Federal Reporter, Refinancing, Forum selection clause, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Citigroup, Emergency Economic Stabilization Act 2008 (USA), Second Circuit, Ninth Circuit, Seventh Circuit, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
    Decision in DHP Holdings considers forum selection clause in deciding whether to grant motion to change venue
    2010-11-01

    In September of this year, the Honorable Mary F. Walrath, the presiding Judge in the DHP Holdings bankruptcy, issued a decision addressing the effect of a forum selection clause when deciding a motion to change venue. This issue came before the court in an adversary action filed by DHP against The Home Depot. After DHP filed for bankruptcy, the company sued Home Depot for $5.5 million alleging Home Depot owed the company for an outstanding account receivable.

    Filed under:
    USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Breach of contract, Fraud, Accounts receivable, Federal Reporter, Consideration, Forum selection clause, Prima facie, Small Business Administration (USA), United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit, US District Court for District of Delaware
    Authors:
    L. Jason Cornell
    Location:
    USA
    Firm:
    Fox Rothschild LLP
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days