Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Representative counsel motions may impose greater costs on secured creditors than were bargained for
    2010-06-01

    The restructuring proceedings of Canwest Publishing Inc and affiliated entities (“Canwest”) has recently provided secured lenders and particularly debtor-in-possession lenders with some food for thought.

    In March of this year, four former non-unionized employees of Canwest brought a motion in the Ontario Superior Court of Justice (the “Court”) for the appointment of representative counsel to protect the interests of themselves and similarly situated former employees in the Canwest Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (“CCAA”) restructuring proceedings.

    Filed under:
    Canada, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Norton Rose Fulbright, Costs in English law, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Interest, Consent, Legal burden of proof, Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act 1933 (Canada), Ontario Superior Court of Justice
    Authors:
    Evan Cobb
    Location:
    Canada
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright Canada LLP
    Determining termination values under the GMRA - avoiding the banana skins
    2008-10-14

    Introduction

    Following the administration proceedings recently instituted against a number of UK entities (Affected Companies), many counterparties (Counterparties) may wish to terminate transactions under the TBMA/ISMA Global Master Repurchase Agreement (GMRA) entered into between them and Affected Companies.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Norton Rose Fulbright, Costs in English law, Security (finance), Good faith, Default (finance), Valuation (finance)
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Norton Rose Fulbright

    Pagination

    • First page « First
    • Previous page ‹‹
    • …
    • Page 12
    • Page 13
    • Page 14
    • Page 15
    • Page 16
    • Page 17
    • Page 18
    • Page 19
    • Current page 20
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days