Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Dispute Resolution round-up - October 2022
    2022-10-13

    Welcome to the eighth edition of our quarterly disputes newsletter, which covers key developments in the dispute resolution world over the last three months or so.

    Filed under:
    European Union, United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Company & Commercial, Competition & Antitrust, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Law Firm Management, Legal Practice, Litigation, Public, Travers Smith LLP, Corporate governance, Brexit, Blockchain, Mediation, Cryptocurrency, Force majeure, ESG, Non-fungible tokens, European Commission, Competition and Markets Authority (UK), House of Lords, HSBC, Pfizer, Arbitration Act 1996 (UK), Limitation Act 1980 (UK), Competition Act 1998 (UK), UK Supreme Court
    Authors:
    Rob Fell
    Location:
    European Union, United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Travers Smith LLP
    Frames of reference: CMA publishes fines against online sports poster retailer for resale price maintenance
    2016-10-24

    On 30 September 2016, the Competition and Markets Authority (“CMA”) published its finding that two companies involved in the online retail of licensed sport and entertainment posters and frames had breached the Competition Act 1998 (“CA98”) by entering into agreements (or, at least, ‘concerted practices’) to artificially inflate the prices charged for certain products. A formal charge was accepted by the main protagonist, Trod Limited (in administration) (“Trod”) and fines imposed, which became payable by Trod’s administrators as of 13 October 2016.

    Filed under:
    United Kingdom, Competition & Antitrust, Insolvency & Restructuring, Internet & Social Media, Charles Russell Speechlys, Competition and Markets Authority (UK), Competition Act 1998 (UK)
    Authors:
    Rory Ashmore
    Location:
    United Kingdom
    Firm:
    Charles Russell Speechlys
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days