Skip to main content
Enter a keyword
  • Login
  • Home

    Main navigation

    Menu
    • US Law
      • Chapter 15 Cases
    • Regions
      • Africa
      • Asia Pacific
      • Europe
      • North Africa/Middle East
      • North America
      • South America
    • Headlines
    • Education Resources
      • ABI Committee Articles
      • ABI Journal Articles
      • Covid 19
      • Conferences and Webinars
      • Newsletters
      • Publications
    • Events
    • Firm Articles
    • About Us
      • ABI International Board Committee
      • ABI International Member Committee Leadership
    • Join
    Guidance for receivers on post-appointment tax liabilities
    2019-04-11

    The Commissioner of Taxation (Commissioner) recently issued draft taxation determination TD 2019/D2 (TD 2019/D2) dealing with the important question of a receiver’s obligation to retain money for post-appointment tax liabilities. A link to TD2019/D2.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Johnson Winter Slattery, Australian Taxation Office, Commissioner of Taxation (Australia), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Australia), High Court of Australia
    Authors:
    Ben Renfrey
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Johnson Winter Slattery
    Bruton Holdings – ATO has no power to garnishee debt after commencement of winding up
    2009-10-07

    Introduction

    By unanimous decision in Bruton Holdings Pty Limited (in liquidation) v Commissioner of Taxation1, five members of the High Court have reversed a controversial decision of the Full Federal Court to confirm that the Commissioner of Taxation (Commissioner) cannot ‘leap-frog’ other creditors in a liquidation.2

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Debt, Liability (financial accounting), Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Australian Taxation Office, Commissioner of Taxation (Australia), Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Income Tax Assessment Act 1936 (Australia), High Court of Justice (England & Wales), Federal Court of Australia, High Court of Australia
    Authors:
    Paul Wenk
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
    Commissioner of Taxation circumvents the abolition of taxation priority in liquidations
    2016-05-06

    This week’s TGIF considers the recent NSW Court of Appeal decision of Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v 4 Doonan Street Collinsville Pty Ltd (in liq) [2016] NSWCA 69 in which the Court considered the validity of the Commissioner of Taxation’s treatment of debits and credits in an insolvency context.

    FACTS

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Tax deduction, Commissioner of Taxation (Australia), New South Wales Supreme Court
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    ATO releases Decision Impact Statement for Australian Building Systems (in liq) case
    2016-01-25

    Late last year, the High Court handed down its decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Australian Building Systems Pty Ltd (in liq) [2015] HCA 48. The High Court held (by a majority of 3:2) that, in the absence of an assessment, a liquidator is not required to retain funds from asset sale proceeds in order to meet a tax liability which could become payable as a result of a capital gain made on the sale.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, MinterEllison, Australian Taxation Office, Commissioner of Taxation (Australia)
    Authors:
    Craig Bowie
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    MinterEllison
    Test case on liquidator tax obligations - High Court allows ATO to appeal
    2015-04-20

    The High Court has granted special leave to appeal the decision in Commissioner of Taxation v Australian Building Systems Pty Ltd(in liq) [2014] FCAFC 133 which held that a liquidator is not required to retain funds from the proceeds of sale of an asset to pay tax before an assessment is issued.

    Practical Implications

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, MinterEllison, Liquidator (law), Australian Taxation Office, Commissioner of Taxation (Australia)
    Authors:
    David Pratley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    MinterEllison
    To withhold tax or not to withhold? That is the liquidator’s question!
    2014-05-09

    The recent decision of Australian Building Systems Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 116 involves a significant development in the taxation collection obligations of liquidators involved in winding up a company.

    In this Alert, Special Counsel Justin Byrne and Solicitor Rachael Nyst discuss the implications of the case in regard to the need to retain an amount from sale proceeds of a property in order to meet capital gains tax (CGT) liabilities.

    Key points

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Tax, HopgoodGanim, Capital gains tax, Liquidator (law), Commissioner of Taxation (Australia)
    Authors:
    Luke Mountford
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    HopgoodGanim
    Federal Court finds liquidator not required to retain funds from sale of assets to pay tax
    2014-02-25

    On 21 February 2014, the Federal Court handed down its decision inAustralian Building Systems Pty Limited v Commissioner of Taxation [2014] FCA 116 (Australian Building Systems). The Court found that a liquidator was not legally required to retain an amount out of the proceeds on disposal of assets as part of the winding up of a company to pay tax which is or will become due in respect of a capital gain.

    Filed under:
    Australia, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, PwC Australia, Income tax, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Commissioner of Taxation (Australia)
    Authors:
    Ronen Vexler , James O’Reilly , Michael Bona , Scott Bryant , Peter Konidaris
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    PwC Australia
    Recovering domestic taxes and penalties on a pari passu basis before Australian assets are remitted to foreign liquidators
    2013-12-12

    A recent Federal Court of Australia decision has granted the Australian Commissioner of Taxation the right to recover, from a failed foreign company’s Australian assets, the pari passu amount the Commissioner would have been entitled to receive (on account of outstanding domestic tax and penalties) if he had been allowed to prove in the liquidation before the assets are remitted to the company’s foreign representatives (the liquidators). 

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, DLA Piper, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Commissioner of Taxation (Australia), Federal Court of Australia
    Authors:
    Amy Nolan
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    Recovering domestic taxes and penalties on a pari passu basis before Australian assets are remitted to foreign liquidators
    2013-12-12

    A recent Federal Court of Australia decision has granted the Australian Commissioner of Taxation the right to recover, from a failed foreign company’s Australian assets, the pari passu amount the Commissioner would have been entitled to receive (on account of outstanding domestic tax and penalties) if he had been allowed to prove in the liquidation before the assets are remitted to the company’s foreign representatives (the liquidators). 

    Filed under:
    Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, DLA Piper, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Commissioner of Taxation (Australia), Federal Court of Australia
    Authors:
    Amy Nolan
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    DLA Piper
    Commissioner of Taxation circumvents the abolition of taxation priority in liquidations
    2016-05-06

    This week’s TGIF considers the recent NSW Court of Appeal decision of Commissioner of Taxation of the Commonwealth of Australia v 4 Doonan Street Collinsville Pty Ltd (in liq) [2016] NSWCA 69 in which the Court considered the validity of the Commissioner of Taxation’s treatment of debits and credits in an insolvency context.

    FACTS

    Filed under:
    Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Tax deduction, Commissioner of Taxation (Australia), New South Wales Supreme Court
    Authors:
    David Abernethy , Kirsty Sutherland , Mark Wilks , Matthew Critchley
    Location:
    Australia
    Firm:
    Corrs Chambers Westgarth
    Home

    Quick Links

    • US Law
    • Headlines
    • Firm Articles
    • Board Committee
    • Member Committee
    • Join
    • Contact Us

    Resources

    • ABI Committee Articles
    • ABI Journal Articles
    • Conferences & Webinars
    • Covid-19
    • Newsletters
    • Publications

    Regions

    • Africa
    • Asia Pacific
    • Europe
    • North Africa/Middle East
    • North America
    • South America

    © 2025 Global Insolvency, All Rights Reserved

    Joining the American Bankruptcy Institute as an international member will provide you with the following benefits at a discounted price:

    • Full access to the Global Insolvency website, containing the latest worldwide insolvency news, a variety of useful information on US Bankruptcy law including Chapter 15, thousands of articles from leading experts and conference materials.
    • The resources of the diverse community of United States bankruptcy professionals who share common business and educational goals.
    • A central resource for networking, as well as insolvency research and education (articles, newsletters, publications, ABI Journal articles, and access to recorded conference presentation and webinars).

    Join now or Try us out for 30 days