The Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) has been at loggerheads with the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 (PMLA) on various occasions in the corporate insolvency resolution process (CIRP) of a distressed entity. Courts and tribunals have passed varying judgments, either giving primacy to the IBC or allowing the Enforcement Directorate (ED), a functionary under the PMLA, to perform its duties irrespective of the ongoing CIRP of a company.

The rights of secured creditors under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (Code) have been a matter of continuous litigation and uncertainty. Early on, the challenge presented itself when during the insolvency resolution of Essar steel (India) Ltd., the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) directed the distribution of resolution plan proceeds equally amongst all classes of creditors, including financial, operational, secured and unsecured creditors.

Introduction
Critical supplies
Issues with concept of critical supplies
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Source of delay
Comment

Introduction

Information utilities (IUs) established under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code provide authenticated information about debt and default, which an adjudicating authority can rely on as evidence of money owed by the company facing insolvency.

Introduction
Delays at plan approval stage
Measures to reduce delays

Introduction

Introduction
Decision
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Corporate debt discharge
Jurisdictional challenges
Asset tracing
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Key legal issues
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Practical implications
Comment

Introduction

What is likely to be proposed?
What is the likely impact of these proposals?

Following the finance minister's speech proposing the Union Budget 2022, Parliament is likely to consider further amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (IBC) in 2022.