Peter Ferrer, Harneys

This is an extract from the 2022 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

Fabio Guzmán-Saladín and Pamela Benzán Arbaje, Guzmán Ariza

This is an extract from the 2022 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

Ken Baird, Mark Liscio, Michael Broeders, Marvin Knapp, Samantha Braunstein and Katharina Crinson, Freshfields Bruckhaus Deringer

This is an extract from the 2022 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

Richard J Cooper, Lisa M Schweitzer, Jessica Metzger and Richard C Minott, Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton

This is an extract from the 2022 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

Luiz Fernando Valente de Paiva, Giuliano Colombo, Andre Moraes Marques, Thiago Junqueira and Carolina Kiyomi Iwamoto, Pinheiro Neto Advogados

This is an extract from the 2022 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

John Wasty, John Riihiluoma, Lalita Vaswani and Sam Riihiluoma, Appleby

This is an extract from the 2022 edition of GRR's the Americas Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

A three-judge Bench of the Supreme Court of India (SC) in V. Nagarajan v. SKS Ispat and Power Ltd. & Others (judgment dated 22 October 2021 in Civil Appeal No. 3327 of 2020) dismissed an appeal against an order passed by the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) which had dismissed an appeal against an order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal Chennai (NCLT) under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC) as barred by limitation.

Facts

Chul Man Kim, Sun Kyoung Kim, Sy Nae Kim and Woo Suk Jung, Yulchon LLC

This is an extract from the 2022 edition of GRR's the Asia-Pacific Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

Abhishek Tripathi and Mani Gupta, Sarthak Advocates & Solicitors

This is an extract from the 2022 edition of GRR's the Asia-Pacific Restructuring Review. The whole publication is available here.

In summary

Introduction:

Aggrieved by the order of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) refusing to condone a delay of 44 (forty-four) days in filing an appeal against the order passed by the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT), the Appellant (i.e., National Spot Exchange Limited) preferred an appeal before the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India.