In brief

The Federal Court has ordered that an insolvency professional be appointed to act as a referee and to decide questions of insolvency in relation to a series of alleged unfair preferences, rather than have the judge undertake that task.

Contents

In brief

The Federal Court has ordered that an insolvency professional be appointed to act as a referee and to decide questions of insolvency in relation to a series of alleged unfair preferences, rather than have the judge undertake that task.

Key takeaways

In brief

As of 19 October 2020, the changes to the Bankruptcy Code of Ukraine became effective.

What’s new

From 17 October 2020, and for the quarantine period, the following changes are introduced in the bankruptcy procedure:

In brief

Simplified Insolvency Programme (“SIP”)

In brief

In brief

In addition to the comprehensive economic support and stimulus program launched by the UAE Central Bank to curb the financial impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, the UAE has introduced radical amendments to the UAE Bankruptcy Law, offering distressed debtors with some level of leniency during these times of economic uncertainty and market disruption caused by circumstances outside of their control.

In brief

In brief

Simplified Insolvency Programme (“SIP”)

In brief

As of 19 October 2020, the changes to the Bankruptcy Code of Ukraine became effective. 

What’s new

From 17 October 2020, and for the quarantine period, the following changes are introduced in the bankruptcy procedure:

In Cant v Mad Brothers Earthmoving [2020] VSCA 198, the Court of Appeal of the Supreme Court of Victoria has clarified the application of the unfair preference regime in the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) to payments made by third parties at the direction of a debtor to its creditors. In short, a payment to a creditor by a third party at the direction of the debtor will not be ‘from’ the debtor unless the payment diminishes the assets available to the debtor’s other creditors.

Background