On 28 January, the English High Court handed down the first ever judgment sanctioning a restructuring plan under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 (“CA 2006”) (“Plan”) invoking the new cross class cram down procedure introduced into UK law in June 2020.
With the fallout from the pandemic hitting many businesses, those considering insolvency should look at the broad gamut of options on offer to avoid winding up the company. Matthew Padian, managing associate, explains.
After a somewhat leisurely start, case law regarding the new restructuring plan in Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006 now seems to be picking up pace.
Introduction
In Uralkali v Rowley and another [2020] EWHC 3442 (Ch), the High Court has confirmed the position in relation to the duties that officeholders owe to third parties involved in the sale process of a business and assets out of an insolvent estate.
On 13 January 2020, the High Court sanctioned the restructuring plans proposed by three UK companies in the DeepOcean group, under Part 26A of the Companies Act 2006.
The new German stabilizing and out of court restructuring regime came into effect on 1 January 2021. The "Stabilization and Restructuring Framework of Companies Act", known as StaRUG1, heralds a new phase in the German restructuring landscape, introducing a framework of tools including a new restructuring plan, which will enable debtors to restructure and cram down minority creditors outside of German insolvency proceedings for the first time.
Will the end of the moratorium on evicting commercial tenants in March prompt more CVAs?
With the moratorium on forfeiture of commercial leases for non-payment of rent set to expire on 31 March, many tenants will be working out how to pay their rents. Using a company voluntary arrangement (CVA) may offer one way of compromising rents if landlords decline to negotiate a rent reduction.
But the road towards a CVA is not without its potholes, and there are two key signs that landlords are growing increasingly savvy when reacting to them.
On 29 January 2020, the Insolvency Service published its quarterly insolvency statistics for October to December 2020 (Q3 2020).
While there has been much fuss over the recent ruling by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York in In re Nine West LBO Securities Litigation1 due to its potential ramifications for director liability, as we explored in Part I of our series on this case here, court watchers have paid less attention to the court’s treatment of officer liability and the interes