Fulltext Search
At day's end, Nortel bankruptcy judges land on what is fair and reasonable

Original Newsletter(s) this article was published in: Blaneys on Business Bulletin: June 2015

The courts in Ontario and Delaware have decided who is to be paid what from the more than $7.1 billion available to meet creditors’ claims in the Nortel Networks insolvency, closing the 120-year-old book on Canada’s first global research, development and technology enterprise.

Canada, USA, Delaware, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Blaney McMurtry LLP
The Supreme Court rules that bankruptcy judges may adjudicate Stern claims with the parties’ knowing and voluntary consent

To Our Clients and Friends Memorandum friedfrank.com Copyright © 2015 Fried, Frank, Harris, Shriver & Jacobson LLP 06/04/15 A Delaware Limited Liability Partnership 1 The Supreme Court Rules That Bankruptcy Judges May Adjudicate Stern Claims with the Parties’ Knowing and Voluntary Consent On May 26, 2015, the Supreme Court in Wellness International Network v.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Consent, Article III US Constitution, United States bankruptcy court
Target stores insolvency biggest in Canadian retail history: creditors working together to win equitable settlement

The biggest insolvency in national retailing history, Target stores’ Canadian subsidiary, is scheduled to take key steps on the road to resolution this month and over the summer.

Target Canada applied for protection under the Companies’ Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA) last January 15 so that it could restructure and liquidate. It then closed all its 133 stores, eliminating the jobs of more than 14,000 employees and leaving its landlords and almost 1,800 other suppliers on the hook for close to $3 billion. 

Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Blaney McMurtry LLP, Retail, Commercial law, Ontario Superior Court of Justice
Supreme Court rules that an order denying confirmation of a chapter 13 plan is not a final appealable order

On May 4, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States affirmed the order of the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit dismissing the appeal of chapter 13 debtor Luis Bullard for lack of jurisdiction.1 The Court held that the order of the Bankruptcy Court denying confirmation of Bullard’s proposed chapter 13 plan was not a final order from which Bullard could immediately appeal as of right.2 The Court reasoned that, while confirmation of a plan can be said to fix the rights and obligations of the parties in a way that alters the status quo, d

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Debtor, United States bankruptcy court, First Circuit
Bankruptcy Court in Delaware rules Caesars’ bankruptcy cases belong in Chicago despite involuntary petition in Delaware

In a battle over proper venue for the chapter 11 cases of In re Caesars Entertainment Operating Company, Inc.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Bankruptcy, United States bankruptcy court
Second Circuit holds that equitable mootness doctrine applies to appeals from orders confirming liquidating chapter 11 plans

On October 29, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit affirmed the decision of the District Court for the Southern District of New York dismissing as equitably moot appeals filed by three individuals (the “Appellants”) in the chapter 11 case of In re BGI Inc. f/k/a Borders Group, Inc.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Liquidation, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
District of Delaware attributes value to Debtor’s credit facility in denying a fraudulent transfer claim based on unreasonably small capital despite existing basis for lenders to terminate and subsequent termination of the facility

On September 30, 2014, in In re SemCrude, L.P.,1 the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, affirming the Bankruptcy Court’s decision, held that direct partnership distributions by debtor SemGroup, L.P. (the “Debtor”) and indirect partnership distributions by its general partner, SemGroup G.P., L.L.C., to certain limited and general partners could not be avoided as constructive fraudulent transfers.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Line of credit
Quadrant v. Vertin: duty to maximize value of an insolvent enterprise—business judgment rule applies to interested directors’ “risky” strategy to increase value, even though creditors bear the downside and the controller stands to benefit

In Quadrant Structured Products Company, Ltd. v. Vertin (October 1, 2014), Vice Chancellor Laster clarified the Delaware Chancery Court’s approach to breach of fiduciary duty derivative actions brought by creditors against the directors of an insolvent corporation.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Business judgement rule, Delaware Court of Chancery
Second Circuit holds that a sale by a chapter 15 debtor in a foreign main proceeding of a claim against an obligor located in the U.S. must be reviewed by the U.S. Bankruptcy Court under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code

On September 26, 2014, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, overturning decisions by the Bankruptcy Court and the District Court for the Southern District of New York, held that the Bankruptcy Court was required to review under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code the transfer of a claim by a chapter 15 debtor with a recognized foreign main proceeding pending in the British Virgin Islands (the “BVI”).1     In a case under chapter 15 of the Bankruptcy Code in which a foreign main proceeding has been recognized, section 1520(a)(2) of the Bankr

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fried Frank Harris Shriver & Jacobson LLP, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
Joint debts, joint tenants - insolvency law meets real property law

Original Newsletter(s) this article was published in: Commercial Litigation Update: October 2014

Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Blaney McMurtry LLP, Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act 1985 (Canada)