In a decision that may have significant practical implications to the practice of bankruptcy law, the U.S. Supreme Court recently declared, on constitutional grounds, that a bankruptcy court cannot exercise jurisdiction over a debtor’s state law counterclaims, thus considerably limiting the ability of the bankruptcy court to fully and finally adjudicate claims in a bankruptcy case. Stern v. Marshall, No. 10-179 (June 23, 2011).
USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Mintz, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Tortious interference, Defamation, Exclusive jurisdiction, US Constitution, Article III US Constitution, Article I US Constitution, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court