Introduction
Key legal issues
Comment

Introduction

Introduction
Practical implications
Comment

Introduction

A bankruptcy court’s recent decision in Bailey Tool & Mfg. Co., et al. v. Republic Bus. Credit (In re Bailey Tool & Mfg. Co.), Adv. No. 16-03025-SGJ (Bankr. N.D. Tex. Dec. 23, 2021) serves as a reminder for lenders that they should avoid certain actions when dealing with distressed borrowers. Specifically, in Bailey, a bankruptcy judge found a lender squarely at fault for its borrower’s bankruptcy and subsequent liquidation, and held the lender liable to the borrower’s bankruptcy estate for various breach of contract, tort, and bankruptcy claims.

Within the past 18 months, two bankruptcy courts have used the same factors, but reached opposite conclusions, about the characterization of two merchant cash advance funding transactions as either a “true sale” or not a “true sale” – and instead, a disguised financing. In doing so, the courts’ decisions confirm the importance of appropriate structuring to achieve true sale treatment.

What is likely to be proposed?
What is the likely impact of these proposals?

Following the finance minister's speech proposing the Union Budget 2022, Parliament is likely to consider further amendments to the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code 2016 (IBC) in 2022.

Introduction
Advantages of consolidation
Issues and challenges

Introduction

Introduction
Privatisation of discoms
Insolvency tribunal
Comment

Introduction

Guidelines for CoCs
Amendments relating to process
Swiss challenge

Introduction
Systemic challenges
Other challenges
Suggestions on way forward

Introduction

Introduction
Insolvency resolution
Companies Act 2013
Comment

Introduction