Fulltext Search
Striking off and winding up Guernsey companies

Introduction

Under the Companies (Guernsey) Law, 2008 (the “Companies Law”) there are two procedures available for the voluntary dissolution of a Guernsey company. A Guernsey company may be dissolved either by way of a “voluntary striking off” or a “voluntary winding up”. We set out below the details of each procedure.

Guernsey, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Private Client & Offshore Services, AO HALL Advocates, Liquidation
There’s no equity in law

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Amicus curiae, Title 11 of the US Code, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
Shadow directors – power and influence bring responsibility

Introduction 

Guernsey, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, AO HALL Advocates, Board of directors, Companies Act 2006 (UK)
The ABCs of Chapter 15 -- Third Circuit upholds broad scope of recognition in cross-border cases

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Collateral (finance), Limited liability company, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Unsecured creditor, Third Circuit
That makes two for the FDIC: 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issues another precedential decision interpreting tax sharing agreements in bankruptcy, awards ownership of tax refund to FDIC

The Bottom Line: 

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Eleventh Circuit
Second Circuit in AMR Corp. – “no make-whole” based on plain meaning of indentures and discusses consequences of section 1110 payments

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bond (finance), Default (finance), Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit
Third Circuit confirms narrow construction of the doctrine of equitable mootness – burden on appellant and use of the doctrine should be “rare”

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Class action, Legal burden of proof, Third Circuit
It’s called "adequate" – not "automatic" – protection

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Legal burden of proof, Tax lien, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Tax sharing agreements in bankruptcy – a tale of two jurisdictions

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Holding company, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Eleventh Circuit
Stay here – Second Circuit in Residential Capital holds automatic stay can be applied to non-debtors where action has an immediate adverse economic consequence for estate

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Mortgage-backed security, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Second Circuit, Fourth Circuit