Fulltext Search
Void ab initio: the dangers of insufficient disclosure

While it is common practice in Canada to seek certain emergency orders on an ex parte basis (i.e. where only one party (and not the adversary) appears before a judge), applicants for such orders are held to a high standard of candour with the court.

Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Ex parte
Constructive trust 1 vs. secured creditor 0

Many secured creditors see their position in absolute terms. They rely on their general security and aggressively assert their priority over unsecured creditors, such as trade creditors. However, a recent decision of the Ontario Court of Appeal(306440 Ontario Ltd. v. 782127 Ontario Ltd. (Alrange Container Services), 2014 ONCA 548) demonstrates that creative arguments by trade creditors may allow them to take priority over even secured creditors in certain circumstances, by using trust principles to remove assets from the estate.

Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cassels Brock & Blackwell LLP, Unsecured debt, Secured creditor, Constructive trust, Court of Appeal for Ontario
There’s no equity in law

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Amicus curiae, Title 11 of the US Code, Supreme Court of the United States, United States bankruptcy court
The ABCs of Chapter 15 -- Third Circuit upholds broad scope of recognition in cross-border cases

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Collateral (finance), Limited liability company, Liquidation, Liquidator (law), Unsecured creditor, Third Circuit
That makes two for the FDIC: 11th Circuit Court of Appeals issues another precedential decision interpreting tax sharing agreements in bankruptcy, awards ownership of tax refund to FDIC

The Bottom Line: 

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Eleventh Circuit
Second Circuit in AMR Corp. – “no make-whole” based on plain meaning of indentures and discusses consequences of section 1110 payments

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bond (finance), Default (finance), Title 11 of the US Code, Second Circuit
Third Circuit confirms narrow construction of the doctrine of equitable mootness – burden on appellant and use of the doctrine should be “rare”

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Class action, Legal burden of proof, Third Circuit
It’s called "adequate" – not "automatic" – protection

The Bottom Line

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Collateral (finance), Legal burden of proof, Tax lien, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel
Tax sharing agreements in bankruptcy – a tale of two jurisdictions

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Bankruptcy, Holding company, Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (USA), Eleventh Circuit
Stay here – Second Circuit in Residential Capital holds automatic stay can be applied to non-debtors where action has an immediate adverse economic consequence for estate

The Bottom Line:

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel LLP, Debtor, Mortgage-backed security, Federal Housing Finance Agency, Second Circuit, Fourth Circuit