Pursuant to paragraph 11 of the order of Mr Justice Foxton dated 20 May 2020 (the ‘Order’), the Viscount of the Royal Court of Jersey (the Fifth and Tenth Respondent) has, on the request of Harbour Fund II LP (the Seventh Respondent), instructed Addleshaw Goddard to post a copy of Schedule 4 to the Order on its website.
Schedule 4 of the Order reads as follows:
CLAIM NO: CL-2017-000323
Key insolvency provisions: a practical guide to what has changed and why
TEMPORARY PROVISIONS
1. SUSPENSION OF WRONGFUL TRADING PROVISIONS
What's changed?
Included in this update: Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill introduced to Parliament; FRC updates guidance on corporate governance and reporting and more...
Corporate Insolvency and Governance Bill introduced to Parliament
Speed read
The High Court has recently ruled that the agreement between the liquidator of a company and the parent of that company, which contemplated the transfer of all of the assets of the company to the parent gave rise to a trust arrangement on the facts of the case. As a consequence of that trust arrangement, lands which were inadvertently not transferred by the liquidator in the course of the liquidation were deemed not to have vested in the State when the company was dissolved, as would otherwise have been the case under the State Property Act, 1954.
The COVID-19 global crisis has brought cross border insolvencies into focus as companies consider the challenges that may arise where assets are situated across a number of jurisdictions and where an insolvency event may occur. Drawing on our experience of cross border restructurings, and the issues that should be considered, we look at the key issues to consider when assessing if you should implement a restructuring where an Irish company is involved and which restructuring tool to avail of.
It has been reported that Debenhams which entered administration earlier this month for the second time will be managed as a 'light touch' administration.
In this article we look at what this actually means and whether 'light touch' administration could be a useful tool for both businesses and insolvency practitioners looking to negotiate a route through the coronavirus pandemic.
On 28 March 2020, the Government proposed certain insolvency law reforms in response to the COVID-19 crisis, including a temporary suspension of wrongful trading provisions for company directors.
The measures are intended to apply retrospectively from 1 March 2020 for three months, and aim to encourage directors to continue to trade during the pandemic.
This is the second litigation involving the furlough scheme in the insolvency context, following on from Re Carluccio's (in administration). Please refer to our note on Carluccio's for background reading on how the furlough scheme weaves into insolvency law.
Issue
In the first litigation involving the Furlough scheme, the court in Re Carluccio's (in administration) ruled on how the administrators can lawfully give effect to furlough arrangements with the employees who have agreed to the variation of their employment contract.
Read on for our analysis of the case which gives an interesting insight into how the courts in the future might interpret the furlough scheme.
1. Background
Carluccio’s in administration
GENERAL INSOLVENCY LANDSCAPE IN GERMANY PRE-COVID-19
Without undue delay upon occurrence of illiquidity or overindebtedness, at the latest within three weeks, members of the representing body of a legal entity have to apply for the opening of insolvency proceedings over the assets of such entity
INSOLVENCY REASONS: