In recent cases where lawyers have signed proofs of claim for their clients and litigation ensued, the signing attorneys were deposed with respect to the facts surrounding submission of the claims.  For some time, an attorney who signed a proof of claim on his client’s behalf has been risking disqualification or being called as a fact witness concerning the factual basis for the claim in related litigation.

As many areas continue to rebound slightly from the real-estate downturn, much litigation still exists related to the exposure of guarantors for corporate-entity real estate loans.   In many instances a corporation or Limited Liability Company (LLC) may have filed for Chapter 11 in an effort to stave off a foreclosure and restructure the secured debt. However, it is well settled that a corporate bankruptcy case does not operate to discharge a guaranty from a guarantor who is not in bankruptcy.

As wealth preservation for future generations has become a popular topic among clients, estate planning practitioners have changed their tune when advising clients on how distributions should be made to beneficiaries.

In its Scantling opinion, the Eleventh Circuit held that a Chapter 20 debtor (a chapter 13 debtor who previously filed and concluded a chapter 7 case) could strip off valueless junior liens on her principal residence even thought she was ineligible for a discharge in the chapter 13 case. Full disclosure: our firm, Berger Singerman, represented the appellee, Ms. Scantling.

The Eleventh Circuit’s recent opinion in Wiand v. Lee clarifies longstanding issues relating to an equity receiver’s standing to pursue clawback claims for the benefit of the receivership estate under the Florida Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act (“FUFTA”).  See Wiand v. Lee, 2014 WL 2446084 (11th Cir. Jun.