Fulltext Search

Can messy be good? Sometimes the answer is yes. The chapter 11 case filed by Limetree Bay Services, LLC and five of its affiliates (“Limetree Bay”) is one example of auction disorder actually bringing increased creditor recoveries. Bankruptcy professionals, financially distressed companies and acquirers of distressed assets can learn valuable lessons from this odd bankruptcy auction process, which shows the importance of (1) debtors preserving their flexibility during an auction, and (2) investors having appropriate expectations and resources before bidding on a debtor’s assets.

On December 16, 2021, United States District Judge Colleen McMahon of the Southern District of New York overturned the confirmation of Purdue Pharma’s chapter 11 plan of reorganization, “put[ting] to rest” the non-consensual third-party releases debate that has “hovered over bankruptcy law for thirty five years.” Judge McMahon concluded in her 142-page opinion that “the Bankruptcy Code does not authorize such non-consensual

We discussed the announcement that Bulb Energy Ltd (“Bulb”) was due to be placed into special administration in our previous blog outlining how the rules for energy supply companies work, the supplier of last resort (“SoLR”) regime and what energy supply company special administration entails.

Different countries frame the exact description of the role of directors of a company in different terms. One feature is common to all – the obligation not to continue trading if a company is insolvent. Again, the detailed implications of doing so vary from one jurisdiction to another. However, this obligation not to continue wrongful trading is at the heart of trust in a market-based economic system

During 2020, many countries revamped their insolvency laws, introducing temporary or permanent measures to aid and assist companies in financial distress. Governments acted quickly to put in place measures that changed laws, relaxed or suspended legal obligations and introduced new provisions aimed at supporting businesses during the pandemic and avoiding large scale insolvencies. 

This note provides an overview of the English restructuring plan, giving insight into when a foreign company might be able to restructure in England, an overview of the process and the advantages that a restructuring plan offers over other processes.

It should not be relied on as legal advice. Should you require legal advice in relation to your specific circumstances, please contact one of our team members whose contact details are at the end of this note.

What Is a Restructuring Plan ?

簡介

最近在Re Hsin Chong Construction Co., Ltd. [2021] HKCFA 14一案中,終審法院推翻了原訟法庭及上訴法庭(「上訴庭」)的裁決。與上訴庭及原訟法庭的裁決相反,終審法院裁定,於新昌開始清盤後出售其在合營協議項下剩餘權利及權益的交易是無效的。

背景

新昌營造廠有限公司(「該公司」)及Build King Construction Limited(「Build King」)於2013年11月訂立一份合營協議(「合營協議」),以成立及經營一間合營公司(「合營公司」)。合營公司於2016年6月獲得一項大型政府項目合約,其中該公司佔65% 權益,Build King佔餘下35% 權益。

該公司於2017/2018年度開始面臨財政困難。2018年8月27日,該公司被入稟清盤,導致該公司的銀行帳戶被凍結。

Introduction

In the recent case of Re Hsin Chong Construction Co., Ltd. [2021] HKCFA 14, the Court of Final Appeal (“CFA”) overturned the decisions of the Court of First Instance and the Court of Appeal (“CA”) below. The CFA found, contrary to the CA and Court of First Instance, that the disposition of Hsin Chong’s residual rights and interests under a joint venture agreement after the commencement of winding up was void.

Background

简介

最近在Re Hsin Chong Construction Co., Ltd. [2021] HKCFA 14一案中,终审法院推翻了原讼法庭及上诉法庭(「上诉庭」)的裁决。与上诉庭及原讼法庭的裁决相反,终审法院裁定,于新昌开始清盘后出售其在合营协议项下剩余权利及权益的交易是无效的。

背景

新昌营造厂有限公司(「该公司」)及Build King Construction Limited(「Build King」)于2013年11月订立一份合营协议(「合营协议」),以成立及经营一间合营公司(「合营公司」)。合营公司于2016年6月获得一项大型政府项目合约,其中该公司占65% 权益,Build King占余下35% 权益。

该公司于2017/2018年度开始面临财政困难。2018年8月27日,该公司被入禀清盘,导致该公司的银行帐户被冻结。

In the context of the EU Directive 2019/1023/UE of 20 June 2019 (“Directive”) and in the aftermath of the Covid crisis, France has reformed its insolvency legislation. The purpose of the legislation is both to implement the requirements of the Directive into the French legislation, but also to tackle the consequences of the Covid crisis and endorse some of the measures that have been taken in this respect and have brought the number of insolvency proceedings to a historic low, as well as other measures.