Fulltext Search
Supreme Court Pokes a Hole in the Ironclad Nature of Bankruptcy 363 Sales

Purchasers often relish the prospect of buying distressed assets in a bankruptcy proceeding. Under section 363 of the Bankruptcy Code, a buyer may obtain ownership of bankruptcy estate assets “free and clear of any interest” (assuming certain conditions are met), and also be reasonably confident that the sale will not be reversed on appeal. But the U.S. Supreme Court may have now tempered that confidence. In its recent, unanimous opinion, MOAC Mall Holdings LLC v. Transform Holdco LLC, No. 21-1270 (Apr.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLP, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States
U.S. Supreme Court clarifies that Chapter 13 debtors may not deduct car ownership expenses when they make no loan or lease payments

In Ransom v. FIA Card Servs., N.A., --- S.Ct. ----, 2011 WL 66438 (U.S. 2011), the United States Supreme Court took up the question of whether a Chapter 13 debtor who owns his or her vehicle outright (“free and clear”) may claim an allowance for car ownership costs and thereby reduce the amount that he or she will repay creditors. In her first opinion, Justice Kagan answered simply—no. The Ransom opinion has been seen as a victory for not only credit card companies like the one involved but other creditors, as well.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Frost Brown Todd LLP, Bankruptcy, Costs in English law, Debtor, Unsecured debt, Debt, Tax deduction, Internal Revenue Service (USA), Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit, Bankruptcy Appellate Panel