Fulltext Search
The Privy Council makes landmark decision on the arbitrability of winding up petitions

In the recent decision of FamilyMart China Holding Co v Ting Chuan (Cayman Islands) Holding Corporation [2023] UKPC 33 (FamilyMart),[1] the Judicial Committee of the Privy Council (the Board) found that, although an arbitral tribunal does not have the power to determine whether it is just and equitable to wind up a company nor to make a winding u

Cayman Islands, United Kingdom, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ogier, UK Supreme Court, Cayman Islands Court of Appeal
First Circuit Holds that Fifth Amendment Takings Claims Must be Paid in Full

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently ruled in the Puerto Rico bankruptcy case that Fifth Amendment takings claims cannot be discharged or impaired by a bankruptcy plan. As a matter of first impression in that circuit, the Court disagreed with the Ninth Circuit and held that former property owners affected by prepetition takings must be paid in full.

In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd., 41 F.4th 29 (1st Cir. 2022)

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit
The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal Relieves the Tension between Arbitration Clauses and the Just and Equitable Winding Up Jurisdiction

In a comprehensive judgment published on 23 April 2020, the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal, comprising Moses JA, Martin JA and Rix JA, has provided welcome clarification of the interplay between a contractual agreement to arbitrate disputes arising between shareholders and the exclusive jurisdiction of the Court to determine whether a company should be wound up on the just and equitable ground.

Cayman Islands, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Ogier, Arbitration clause