Liquidators have more certainty about their ability to disclaim the environmental liabilities and responsibilities of a company in liquidation.
Australia, Queensland, Company & Commercial, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clayton Utz, Environmental protection, Liquidation, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), Queensland Supreme Court
The liquidators were not bound to cause Linc to comply with the EPO from the date of the disclaimer.
Australia, Queensland, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Clayton Utz
The High Court has struck down a company voluntary arrangement on the ground that it unfairly prejudiced a landlord who was to lose the benefit of a guarantee given by the tenant’s parent company. The judge said it was “unreasonable and unfair in principle” to require the landlord to give up the guarantee and there was “no sufficient justification” for requiring the landlord to accept a sum of money in lieu.
United Kingdom, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Real Estate, Dechert LLP, Retail, Surety, Landlord, Leasehold estate, Electricity, Liquidation, Prejudice, Parent company, Trustee, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)