On May 20, 2019, the U.S. Supreme Court issued a ruling of key significance for trademark licensing and for acquisitions, investments, financings and other transactions in which trademark licenses are a key value driver. In Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v. Tempnology, LLC,[1] the Court held, 8-1, that where the licensor of a trademark rejects a trademark license in bankruptcy, the rejection does not deprive the licensee of its rights to use the licensed trademark(s).
USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Fourth Circuit, Seventh Circuit
In a decision likely to affect thousands of Madoff investors, the Second Circuit Court of Appeals on Aug. 16, 2011 unanimously upheld the method used by the liquidating trustee for Bernard L.
USA, Capital Markets, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, White Collar Crime, Schulte Roth & Zabel LLP, Security (finance), Fraud, Standard of review, Liquidation, Broker-dealer, Investment funds, Market value, Pro rata, Securities Investor Protection Corporation, Trustee, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court