Two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions demonstrate that the corporate attribution doctrine is not a one-size-fits-all approach.
Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Supreme Court of Canada
Court approval of a sale process in receivership or Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) proposal proceedings is generally a procedural order and objectors do not have an appeal as of right; they must seek leave and meet a high test in order obtain it. However, in Peakhill Capital Inc. v.
In September 2020, I wrote a piece on the above case in the Chancery Division of the High Court, which can be found here and here.
United Kingdom, Scotland, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Morton Fraser MacRoberts, HSBC
WHO WILL ADVOCATE FOR THE "HUMBLE" FLOATING CHARGE-HOLDER?[1]
Introduction
United Kingdom, Scotland, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Tax, Morton Fraser MacRoberts, Coronavirus, HM Revenue and Customs (UK)
School specialty, Inc., files bankruptcy in Delaware seeking to sell substantially all of its assets
Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Liquidation, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
Introduction