Two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions demonstrate that the corporate attribution doctrine is not a one-size-fits-all approach.
Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Supreme Court of Canada
Court approval of a sale process in receivership or Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) proposal proceedings is generally a procedural order and objectors do not have an appeal as of right; they must seek leave and meet a high test in order obtain it. However, in Peakhill Capital Inc. v.
O QUE É CHAPTER 11?
Brazil, USA, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Paul Hastings LLP, European Securities and Markets Authority
Second Circuit Court of Appeals Decision in GM Cases Casts a Shadow Over Whether Section 363 Sale Orders Insulate Buyers from Debtors’ Product Liability Claims.
USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Paul Hastings LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Liability (financial accounting), General Motors, Title 11 of the US Code
I. Introduction
USA, Delaware, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Paul Hastings LLP, Bankruptcy, Fiduciary, Limited liability company, United States bankruptcy court
School specialty, Inc., files bankruptcy in Delaware seeking to sell substantially all of its assets
Introduction
Introduction
Introduction
USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fox Rothschild LLP, Bankruptcy, Liquidation, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
Introduction