Two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions demonstrate that the corporate attribution doctrine is not a one-size-fits-all approach.
Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Supreme Court of Canada
Court approval of a sale process in receivership or Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) proposal proceedings is generally a procedural order and objectors do not have an appeal as of right; they must seek leave and meet a high test in order obtain it. However, in Peakhill Capital Inc. v.
The Ontario Court of Appeal (Court) recently affirmed the decision of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice in Nortel Networks Corporation (Re) (Nortel),[1] that the “interest stops” rule applies in proceedings unde
Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dentons, Bond (finance), Interest, Court of Appeal for Ontario
Canada, Employee Benefits & Pensions, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Heenan Blaikie LLP, Debtor, Fiduciary, Beneficiary, Defined benefit pension plan, Supreme Court of Canada
Canada, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Heenan Blaikie LLP, Conflict of interest, Debtor, Fiduciary, Defined benefit pension plan, Supreme Court of Canada
School specialty, Inc., files bankruptcy in Delaware seeking to sell substantially all of its assets
Introduction
Canada, Environment & Climate Change, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Heenan Blaikie LLP, Environmental remediation, Supreme Court of Canada
Introduction