Fulltext Search
Corporate minds do not all think alike: The Supreme Court affirms a purposive approach to the corporate attribution doctrine

Two recent Supreme Court of Canada decisions demonstrate that the corporate attribution doctrine is not a one-size-fits-all approach.

Canada, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Supreme Court of Canada
There’s Something About (Hail) Mary: Appeals of Sale Processes and Pre-Receivership Sale Agreements

Court approval of a sale process in receivership or Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act (“BIA”) proposal proceedings is generally a procedural order and objectors do not have an appeal as of right; they must seek leave and meet a high test in order obtain it. However, in Peakhill Capital Inc. v.

Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, McCarthy Tétrault LLP
Trademark Licensee May Continue Using Trademark Following Debtor’s Rejection of License Agreement, US Supreme Court Rules

Yesterday, in an 8-1 decision, the US Supreme Court held in Mission Product Holdings, Inc. v.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Mayer Brown
Protecting trademark licensee’s right to continued use of trademark when licensor declares bankruptcy

In the case of In re: Exide Technologies, decided on June 1, 2010, the US Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit reversed two lower court decisions and held that a 1991 agreement between Exide Technologies and EnerSys Delaware Inc., which included a license to EnerSys for use of the “EXIDE” trademark, is not an executory contract that can be rejected by Exide in bankruptcy proceedings.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Trademarks, Mayer Brown, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Breach of contract, Debtor in possession, US Code, United States bankruptcy court, Third Circuit