Fulltext Search
The Third Circuit Weighs in on The Warn Act

Short Summary

USA, Employment & Labor, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cole Schotz PC, Worker Adjustment and Retraining Notification Act 1988 (USA), Code of Federal Regulations, Third Circuit
Section 1129(a)(9)(A) Trumps DIP Orders

Traditional DIP Order Carve Outs Do Not Cap the Administrative Claims of Committee Professionals

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cole Schotz PC, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for District of Delaware
In re Roust: Seven Steps to Confirming a Plan in Seven Days

On January 6, 2017, Judge Robert D. Drain of the Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York orally approved a prepackaged plan of reorganization (a “Prepack”) in In re Roust Corporation, et al. (Case No. 16-23786), only seven days after Roust Corporation (“Roust Corp”) and two of its affiliates, CEDC Finance Corporation LLC (“CEDC Finco”) and CEDC Finance Corporation International, Inc. (together with Roust Corp, the “Debtors”), filed petitions for relief under Chapter 11.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cole Schotz PC, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
Yellowstone and the Barton Doctrine in the Third Circuit

The Barton doctrine, which has been imposed in “an unbroken line of cases … as a matter of federal common law,” In re Linton, 136 F.3d 544, 545 (7th Cir. 1998) (Posner, J.), requires that plaintiffs “obtain authorization from the bankruptcy court before initiating an action in another forum against certain officers appointed by the bankruptcy court for actions the officers have taken in their official capacities.” In re Yellowstone Mountain Club, LLC, No. 14-35363, ___ F.3d ___, 2016 WL 6936595, at *2 (9th Cir. Nov.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Cole Schotz PC, United States bankruptcy court
Personal jurisdiction

Tenth Circuit holds that Canadian nationals who conspire to commit a breach of fiduciary duty against a Delaware corporation operating exclusively in Oklahoma are subject to personal jurisdiction in Oklahoma despite their lack of physical contact with the state.  Canadian law firm alleged to have assisted the conspirators is not, however, subject to personal jurisdiction.

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Fiduciary, Personal jurisdiction, Delaware General Corporation Law, Tenth Circuit
District court holds that a bankruptcy action’s automatic stay, and the bankruptcy's court's power to enjoin violations of the stay, applied extraterritorially

Sec. Investor Prot. Corp. v. Bernard L. Madoff Inv. Secs., 474 B.R. 76 (2012)

The trustee for the Securities Investor Protection Act ("SIPA") liquidation of Bernard L. Madoff Investment Securities LLC ("BLMIS") filed a complaint in the bankruptcy court against Maxam Absolute Return Fund Ltd. ("Maxam"), seeking the return of about $100 million distributed to Maxam by BLMIS.  Maxam answered the complaint and then sued the trustee in the Cayman Islands seeking a declaration that it was not required to return the money. 

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Injunction, Extraterritoriality
Bankruptcy court declines to accord comity to reorganization plan approved by Mexican court

In re Vitro, S.A.B. de C.V., No. 11-33335-HDH-15 (Bankr. N.D. Tex. June 13, 2012)

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Baker McKenzie, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Comity, Title 11 of the US Code