Fulltext Search
Left in the dark - Seeking to appoint a voluntary administrator when Board relations crumble

This week’s TGIF considers the case ofIn the matter of Bean and Sprout Pty Ltd [2018] NSWSC 351, an application seeking a declaration as to the validity of the appointment of a voluntary administrator.

What happened?

On 7 December 2018, Mr Kong Yao Chin (Chin) was purportedly appointed as the voluntary administrator of Bean and Sprout Pty Ltd (Company) by a resolution of the Company.

Australia, New South Wales, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Board of directors, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia), New South Wales Supreme Court
Re Run of Re Amerind - Part 2: Circulating Security Interests and Circulating Assets

This week’s TGIF is the second of a two-part series considering Commonwealth v Byrnes [2018] VSCA 41, the Victorian Court of Appeal’s decision on appeal from last year’s Re Amerind decision about the insolvency of corporate trustees.

Australia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth
Has new NSW insurance legislation created more problems than it has solved for claimants, creditors and insolvency practitioners?

In June 2017, the New South Wales Parliament introduced the Civil Liability (Third Party Claims Against Insurers) Act 2017 (NSW Act), designed to clarify the rights of claimants to proceed directly against insurance companies. But in the context of insolvent corporations, has it created more problems than it has solved?

Australia, New South Wales, Insolvency & Restructuring, Insurance, Litigation, Corrs Chambers Westgarth, Corporations Act 2001 (Australia)
In re Louisiana Riverboat Gaming P’ship

In In re Louisiana Riverboat Gaming P’ship (Global Gaming Legends, LLC v. Legends Gaming of Louisana-1, LLC) (“Global Gaming”), the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Western District of Louisiana stayed discovery in an adversary proceeding pending decision on a party’s motion to withdraw the reference to the district court, finding too much risk that the bankruptcy court would later be found to be without authority to handle pre-trial discovery for the “Stern-governed” core claims at issue. Adv. Proc. No. 13AP-1007 (Bankr. W.D. La. Jan. 10, 2014).

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Debtor, Breach of contract, Discovery, Ninth Circuit, United States bankruptcy court
Delaware bankruptcy court holds that mutuality requirement for postpetition setoff is not modified by contract or the safe harbor provision

In an adversary proceeding filed in the American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc. bankruptcy case, the Delaware bankruptcy court affirmed that triangular setoffs are not allowed under the Bankruptcy Code and cannot be modified by contract or under the Bankruptcy Code’s safe harbor provision. In re American Home Mortgage Holdings, Inc., et al., Adv. Proc. No. 11-51851 (Bankr. D. Del. Nov. 8, 2013). Two contracts were at issue – a swap agreement between a bank and American Home Mortgage Investment Corp.

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Safe harbor (law), United States bankruptcy court
In re Big M, Inc.

In re Big M, Inc., No. 13-10233 (DHS), 2013 WL 1681489 (Bankr. D.N.J. April 17, 2013). In Big M, the Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey (the “Bankruptcy Court”) held that the debtor’s privilege did not pass to the creditors’ committee, even though the creditors’ committee obtained authority to investigate certain of the debtor’s causes of action, because the committee was acting as a fiduciary to creditors as opposed to the debtor’s estate.

USA, New Jersey, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Alston & Bird LLP, Debtor, Fiduciary