Fulltext Search
Hong Kong Court of First Instance follows the Guy Lam approach notwithstanding the recent English Privy Council's decision in Sian Participation

We recently blogged (here) about the Privy Council decision of Sian Participation Corporation (In Liquidation) v Halimeda InternationalLtd [2024] UKPC 16 (

Hong Kong, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, Liquidation
All the Single Debtors: Court Refuses to Expand Exceptions to the Single Debtor Rule Under Doctrine of Marshalling

Insolvency and Restructuring Bulletin

Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fasken, Debtor, Court of Appeal of Alberta
Is this the Peak for Reverse Vesting Orders?: BC Court of Appeal Confirms Jurisdiction to Grant RVOs in Receiverships

The BC Court of Appeal has confirmed the jurisdiction for Canadian courts to make reverse vesting orders (“RVO”) in receivership proceedings. British Columbia v.

Canada, British Columbia, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fasken, Insolvency, British Columbia Court of Appeal
Navigating the crossroads between arbitration and insolvency proceedings: the Hong Kong Court of Appeal applies Guy Lam principles in a winding up case involving an arbitration clause

Can a creditor obtain a winding up order against a debtor company if the underlying dispute over the debt is subject to an arbitration agreement between the parties?

Hong Kong, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
The Not So Royal Treatment: Alberta Court Vests Off Gross Overriding Royalties in Insolvency

Overview

In the recent decision of Invico Diversified Income Limited Partnership v NewGrange Energy Inc, 2024 ABKB 214 (“NewGrange”), the Alberta Court of King’s Bench clarified when gross overriding royalties (“GOR”) can be vested out of a debtor company’s estate pursuant to a reverse vesting order (“RVO”). The Court allowed GORs to be vested off under the Applicant’s, Invico Diversified Income Limited Partnership (“Invico”), proposed RVO, finding the GORs to be mere contractual rights and not proper interests in land.

Canada, Alberta, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fasken
Fasken 2023 Insolvency Insights

Case Trends

Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Fasken, Insolvency, Supreme Court of Canada
Just Smile and Waive: Ontario Court Affirms Receivers May Waive Solicitor-Client Privilege

In the recent decision of Ontario Securities Commission v Go-To Developments Holdings Inc et al, 2023 ONSC 5921 (“Go-To Developments”), the Court affirmed a receiver’s ability to control solicitor-client privilege in order to perform their mandate. The Court specifically considered whether a receiver could access email correspondence between the principal of the companies under receivership and other interested parties.

Canada, Ontario, Insolvency & Restructuring, Legal Practice, Litigation, Fasken, Attorney-client privilege, Ontario Securities Commission, Court of Appeal of Alberta
What is the effect of Guy Lam on winding up petitions involving an arbitration clause? A third voice

Where a winding up petition is based on a debt arising from a contract with a non-Hong Kong exclusive jurisdiction clause, the court will tend to dismiss or stay the winding up petition in favour of the parties’ agreed forum unless there are strong countervailing factors.

Hong Kong, Arbitration & ADR, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
When informal workouts don’t work out: English High Court rules bank that lent support to restructuring did not dishonestly assist in putting assets beyond creditors’ reach

In the current economic climate, more and more companies are getting into financial difficulties, informal workouts by debtor companies, with support from certain creditors, seem to be increasingly common.

United Kingdom, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP
English High Court gives guidance on the so-called creditor duty where a company faces solvency-threatening claim

When a company is in the so-called “twilight zone” approaching insolvency, it is well-established that the directors’ fiduciary duties require them to take into account interest of creditors (the so-called “creditor duty”).

Hong Kong, United Kingdom, Company & Commercial, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Herbert Smith Freehills LLP, High Court of Justice (England & Wales)