Fulltext Search
First Circuit Holds that Fifth Amendment Takings Claims Must be Paid in Full

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the First Circuit recently ruled in the Puerto Rico bankruptcy case that Fifth Amendment takings claims cannot be discharged or impaired by a bankruptcy plan. As a matter of first impression in that circuit, the Court disagreed with the Ninth Circuit and held that former property owners affected by prepetition takings must be paid in full.

In re Fin. Oversight & Mgmt. Bd., 41 F.4th 29 (1st Cir. 2022)

USA, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, US Congress, Supreme Court of the United States, Ninth Circuit
Safety and Soundness and the Bankruptcy Code: Does a Bank Commit a Safety and Soundness Violation by Failing to Comply with the Bankruptcy Rules?

It is fair to say that not many, if any, banks have internal controls or policies and procedures to identify and mitigate deficiencies in the bankruptcy practices of banks. Indeed, banks typically rely on their Legal Department or external counsel to make sure banks protect their interests when bank customers file bankruptcy. While the Compliance Department and the Risk Management Department track compliance and risks related to numerous laws, rules and regulations, the Bankruptcy Code and its rules are typically not among those laws and rules.

USA, Banking, Insolvency & Restructuring, Duane Morris LLP, Bankruptcy, Mortgage loan, Foreclosure, Internal control, Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (USA), Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (USA)