In the matter of Chandos Construction Ltd v Restructuring Deloitte Inc, the Supreme Court of Canada issued a judgment on the anti-deprivation rule, which is intended to prevent contracts from frustrating statutory and common law rules relating to insolvency. The Court established that a clause triggered by an event of insolvency or bankruptcy and which has the effect of removing value from the insolvent’s estate is void and unenforceable.
We have recently profiled conflicting cases (available here and here) dealing with a priority contest between supe
Canada, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Tax, McCarthy Tétrault LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Excise, Secured creditor, Canada Revenue Agency, Income-Tax Act 1961 (India), Supreme Court of Canada, Federal Court of Appeal (Canada)