Fulltext Search
UK High Court judgment on ISDA Default Rate calculations in Lehman Waterfall IIC, and supplemental judgment on statutory interest and currency conversion claims in Waterfall IIA and IIB

The High Court in London handed down judgment on Part C of the Lehman Waterfall II Application on 5 October 2016.

The judgment examines the extent of creditors’ entitlements to Default Rate interest on debts arising under ISDA Master Agreements governed by English law and New York law. As some £4.4 billion of LBIE’s admitted claims arise under ISDA Master Agreements and the debts were outstanding for more than five years, this judgment will materially influence the amount of money which must be applied in satisfaction of creditors’ entitlements to statutory interest.

United Kingdom, Banking, Derivatives, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP, International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Lehman Brothers
SDNY Bankruptcy Court allows as a claim unamortized original issue discount generated in a fair market value exchange

The Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York overseeing the Residential Capital (“ResCap”) cases issued an opinion on November 15, 2013 (the “Opinion”)2 allowing the unamortized interest associated with original issue discount (“OID”) that was generated in a fair market value exchange and claimed by ResCap’s junior secured noteholders (the “Holders”). While the OID ruling is only one component of the Opinion,3 it may have far reaching implications, as already evidenced in the pricing of other OID notes that were the product of fair market value exchanges.

USA, New York, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, Bankruptcy, Interest, Fair market value, Second Circuit, United States bankruptcy court, US District Court for the Southern District of New York
The Delaware Bankruptcy Court confirms that lenders in multiple-level financing structures are entitled to the protections of corporate separateness

The Delaware Bankruptcy Court has confirmed that in multiple-debtor chapter 11 cases, the cramdown rules set forth in section 1129(a)(10) of the Bankruptcy Code must be applied on a per debtor basis as opposed to a per plan basis. See In re JER/Jameson Mezz Borrower II, LLC, No. 11-13338 (MFW), 2011 WL 6749058 (Bankr. D. Del. Dec. 22, 2011) (“Jameson”) and In re Tribune Co., No. 08-13141 (KJC), 2011 WL 5142420 (Bankr. D. Del. Oct. 31, 2011) (“Tribune”).

USA, Delaware, Insolvency & Restructuring, Litigation, Dechert LLP, Bankruptcy, Debtor, Title 11 of the US Code, United States bankruptcy court